H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 1-4

Fernando Verdasco holds a 4–1 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2019 Vienna fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 32 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 25, 2019* Vienna ATP 500 R16 Hard Dominic Thiem #5 3-6 6-3 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #40 Match data
May 15, 2019* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #38 4-6 6-4 7-5 Dominic Thiem #4 Match data
Feb 24, 2018* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 QF Clay Fernando Verdasco #40 6-4 6-0 Dominic Thiem #6 Match data
Nov 3, 2017* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #39 6-4 6-4 Dominic Thiem #6 Match data
Jul 2, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Fernando Verdasco #43 5-7 6-4 5-7 6-3 6-4 Dominic Thiem #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,241 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,848 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,889 0 3 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,015 0 7 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,064 0 11 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,145 0 16 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,200 1 17 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,627 1 17 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7