H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs Gilles Simon H2H: 9-2
Dominic Thiem holds a 9–2 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 6–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2019 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
9
–
2
11 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2019* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 6-3 6-1 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Nov 1, 2018* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 6-4 6-2 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| May 27, 2018* | Lyon | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 3-6 7-6(1) 6-1 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Jul 6, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Dominic Thiem | 5-7 6-4 6-2 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2017* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 7-6(7) 6-3 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2017* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 6-4 7-6(4) | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2016* | Metz | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| May 13, 2015* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 7-6(5) 2-0 (ret.) | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2014* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
| May 22, 2014* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Gilles Simon | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2014* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominic Thiem | Gilles Simon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 |