H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 2-0

Dominic Thiem holds a 2–0 lead over Horacio Zeballos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2018 Argentina Open second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Horacio Zeballos
ARG Age 41 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #6 6-4 6-3 Horacio Zeballos #66 Match data Feb 16, 2018* R16 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay
Dominic Thiem #7 6-1 6-3 6-1 Horacio Zeballos #65 Match data Jun 6, 2017* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Horacio Zeballos #841 #39 1,027 1,877 87 131 39.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Horacio Zeballos
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7 — — — — — — —
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 — — — — — — —
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11 2009 5–5 50.0% #45 1,613 0 0
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16 2010 14–26 35.0% #110 1,595 0 0
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17 2011 5–6 45.5% #109 1,598 0 0
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2012 3–9 25.0% #85 1,591 0 0
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2013 14–23 37.8% #56 1,587 0 1
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2014 7–9 43.8% #123 1,633 0 1
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17 2015 2–4 33.3% #124 1,645 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2016 7–13 35.0% #71 1,670 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2017 20–22 47.6% #66 1,759 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2018 10–14 41.7% #173 1,721 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominic Thiem Horacio Zeballos
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 5 13 18 27.8% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
28 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2013 3 9 12 25.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
30 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 5 8 37.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% — 30 51 81 37.0% 55 69 124 44.4% 2 11 13 15.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's and 218/218 of Horacio Zeballos's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominic Thiem Horacio Zeballos
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4% 2009 10/10 6.8 2.7 65.2% 71.0% 57.0% 65.7% 54.8% 66.1% 32.9%
25 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0% 2010 40/40 5.8 2.2 63.1% 67.6% 47.7% 60.4% 40.6% 60.5% 32.0%
26 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0% 2011 11/11 6.0 2.7 61.9% 73.7% 49.3% 65.4% 44.9% 64.3% 34.0%
27 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4% 2012 12/12 5.5 2.8 62.0% 67.1% 51.1% 62.2% 33.6% 61.2% 33.9%
28 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5% 2013 37/37 5.6 2.7 62.6% 69.2% 49.1% 59.1% 36.2% 61.6% 30.6%
29 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1% 2014 16/16 4.0 1.8 59.1% 72.9% 52.7% 59.2% 36.6% 64.5% 30.5%
30 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8% 2015 6/6 7.2 2.8 62.6% 67.8% 44.1% 67.3% 35.5% 59.1% 31.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 20/20 6.2 3.1 60.1% 72.6% 51.9% 55.7% 34.3% 64.1% 28.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 42/42 5.8 2.2 64.1% 71.2% 54.7% 56.0% 37.5% 65.0% 32.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 24/24 6.4 3.0 63.5% 71.6% 50.7% 69.3% 38.9% 64.1% 31.6%
Career — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2% — 218/218 5.8 2.5 62.6% 70.3% 51.0% 60.6% 38.6% 63.0% 31.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominic Thiem Horacio Zeballos
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64 2007 1461 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76 2008 1506 105.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03 2009 1613 122.4 +1.10 -2.29 0.970 50.1% +38 — — 53.8% +0.27 0–2 6–5 (55%) — +0.76
25 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32 2010 1595 130.9 -1.88 -3.97 0.808 46.6% -14 +43 -118 37.2% -1.03 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) 99.7 +0.16
26 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09 2011 1598 122.3 +1.03 -2.09 0.954 49.5% — +59 — 48.0% -0.04 0–1 3–4 (43%) — -0.49
27 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26 2012 1591 117.8 -2.87 -2.13 0.873 48.1% — +83 — 31.0% -0.66 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.33
28 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20 2013 1587 139.5 -1.23 -4.62 0.798 46.8% -106 +128 — 39.6% -0.52 10–5 (67%) 6–13 (32%) 103.9 +1.72
29 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03 2014 1633 127.6 +0.28 -3.69 0.858 48.3% -130 +105 — 41.7% -0.45 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 101.6 +0.69
30 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23 2015 1645 109.3 -1.33 -2.33 0.758 45.3% — +91 — 35.7% -1.72 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1671 134.9 +0.65 -5.16 0.790 47.3% -42 -28 -181 38.3% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.8 +0.23
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1759 146.3 +0.83 -2.99 0.928 48.8% -104 +58 — 45.6% -0.27 8–4 (67%) 13–13 (50%) 106.3 -1.38
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1721 138.6 +0.08 -3.27 0.880 48.8% -71 +37 — 43.9% -0.35 4–6 (40%) 8–8 (50%) 98.5 -1.23
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1705 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29 — 1877 137.5 -0.40 -3.58 0.854 47.8% -57 +70 -150 41.4% -0.54 32–29 (52%) 52–65 (44%) 103.5 +0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.