H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs John Millman H2H: 3-1
Dominic Thiem holds a 3–1 lead over John Millman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Dominic Thiem leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Millman won the 2022 Belgrade third round 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2022* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | John Millman | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2018* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 6-2 6-2 | John Millman | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 6-3 2-6 5-7 6-4 6-3 | John Millman | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 7-5 6-1 | John Millman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| John Millman | #1,164 | #33 | 1,530 | 1,899 | 113 | 143 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominic Thiem | John Millman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #541 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2015 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #92 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #128 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #48 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #72 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #147 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #483 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |