H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 0-1
Julien Benneteau holds a 1–0 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julien Benneteau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2014 Indian Wells Masters third round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2014* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominic Thiem | Julien Benneteau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |