H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 2-0

Dominic Thiem holds a 2–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2014 Shanghai Masters first round 6-4 7-6(3).

AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #39 6-4 7-6(3) Lukas Rosol #26 Match data Oct 7, 2014* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Dominic Thiem #86 7-6(6) 6-4 Lukas Rosol #38 Match data Mar 21, 2014* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2
31 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2
32 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2
33 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
36 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominic Thiem Lukas Rosol
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 2007 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2009 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2017 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0%
36 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's and 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominic Thiem Lukas Rosol
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4% —/—
18 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9% —/—
19 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3% —/—
20 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1% —/—
21 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1% 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2%
22 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4% 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6%
23 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5% 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0%
24 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4% 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8%
25 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0% 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2%
26 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0% 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6%
27 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4% 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2%
28 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5% 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8%
29 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1% 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1%
30 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8% 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8%
31 —/— 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4%
32 —/— 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3%
33 —/— 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0%
34 —/— 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% 64.3% 20.8%
36 —/— 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7%
Career 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2% 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominic Thiem Lukas Rosol
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.02
18 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 +0.16
19 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 +0.35
20 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.23
22 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 +0.18
23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 +0.02
24 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% 16.7% -2.00 0–1 -0.05
25 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) 97.7 +0.09
26 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) 102.8 -1.04
27 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 97.4 +1.39
28 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) 107.1 -1.09
29 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) 102.7 -1.23
30 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) 101.9 -1.96
31 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.08
32 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 -0.52
33 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.0 +0.37
34 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% 0.0% -3.50 +0.30
35 2021 1546 101.4
36 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 +0.05
37 2023 1540 92.2
Career 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.