H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Malek Jaziri H2H: 1-0

Dominic Thiem holds a 1–0 lead over Malek Jaziri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2015 Eastbourne Open second round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Malek Jaziri
TUN Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #30 6-3 6-1 Malek Jaziri #83 Match data Jun 24, 2015* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Malek Jaziri #1,645 #42 1,042 1,843 84 136 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Malek Jaziri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7 — — — — — — —
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 — — — — — — —
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11 — — — — — — —
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16 — — — — — — —
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17 — — — — — — —
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2011 1–1 50.0% #118 1,536 0 0
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2012 6–11 35.3% #116 1,603 0 0
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2013 0–1 0.0% #168 1,606 0 0
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17 2014 8–11 42.1% #76 1,687 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2015 12–20 37.5% #103 1,681 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2016 15–22 40.5% #58 1,724 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2017 13–22 37.1% #98 1,697 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2018 20–22 47.6% #45 1,716 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2019 6–17 26.1% #201 1,555 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2020 0–2 0.0% #249 1,530 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–3 40.0% #312 1,522 0 0
38 — — — — — — — 2022 1–3 25.0% #433 1,508 0 0
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #1645 1,504 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominic Thiem Malek Jaziri
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 9 14 23 39.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 15 24 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 13 15 28 46.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 10 14 24 41.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% — 56 87 143 39.2% 20 30 50 40.0% 8 19 27 29.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's and 217/220 of Malek Jaziri's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominic Thiem Malek Jaziri
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4% 2011 2/2 6.5 5.5 54.8% 71.2% 50.1% 70.1% 17.6% 61.8% 36.2%
28 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5% 2012 15/17 4.8 2.7 58.9% 65.8% 47.9% 55.5% 31.5% 58.5% 34.1%
29 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1% 2013 1/1 2.0 2.0 48.1% 61.5% 47.6% 54.5% 50.0% 54.3% 24.2%
30 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8% 2014 19/19 3.9 3.1 49.1% 72.1% 48.7% 58.2% 32.9% 60.3% 32.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 32/32 4.4 3.0 52.9% 71.2% 49.6% 61.7% 38.5% 61.1% 34.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 36/37 4.1 3.3 53.0% 72.1% 49.4% 59.0% 33.9% 61.5% 34.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 35/35 4.9 3.5 52.8% 71.1% 47.7% 52.2% 39.8% 60.0% 34.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 42/42 3.7 3.0 54.2% 70.8% 48.4% 55.2% 43.8% 60.3% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 23/23 2.9 3.5 56.1% 67.7% 46.6% 59.9% 43.4% 58.5% 33.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 2.5 2.5 49.0% 41.0% 47.8% 47.2% 0.0% 44.4% 28.3%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 5/5 1.8 1.6 54.3% 60.1% 48.2% 42.0% 77.8% 54.6% 33.9%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.8 1.5 54.1% 66.8% 47.3% 51.8% 41.7% 57.9% 27.8%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 2.0 2.0 43.2% 50.0% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 37.8% 23.1%
Career — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2% — 217/220 4.0 3.1 53.5% 69.8% 48.3% 56.5% 38.8% 59.8% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominic Thiem Malek Jaziri
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09 2010 1457 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26 2011 1536 118.9 -1.79 +0.89 0.949 48.5% — — — 42.9% -0.14 — — — -0.05
28 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20 2012 1604 124.4 -3.73 -1.37 0.823 46.4% +6 -112 +19 43.2% -0.66 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 103.6 +0.22
29 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03 2013 1606 114.7 +2.69 +4.26 0.531 40.8% — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.19
30 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23 2014 1688 125.6 -2.36 -2.49 0.818 47.0% +14 — -54 41.9% -0.79 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 100.8 +1.41
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1681 131.4 -3.13 -1.13 0.876 47.9% +17 -201 -48 39.8% -0.58 6–6 (50%) 3–8 (27%) 97.8 +0.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1725 143.8 -1.50 -1.46 0.889 48.2% -13 -156 -117 43.9% -0.45 6–9 (40%) 8–9 (47%) 98.9 -0.41
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1697 145.4 -3.57 -0.39 0.864 47.4% +47 -170 — 40.0% -0.74 5–7 (42%) 6–8 (43%) 96.8 -1.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1716 138.3 -2.92 -0.31 0.893 48.3% -6 -3 -175 45.4% -0.51 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) 108.0 +0.48
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1555 125.4 -4.00 -2.81 0.797 46.4% +71 +87 — 32.1% -1.09 4–4 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 99.0 +0.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1530 110.8 0.00 -0.76 0.509 36.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.23
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1522 106.5 -3.25 -2.60 0.747 44.6% +80 — — 25.0% -2.13 — — — -0.02
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1509 105.1 -2.52 -2.80 0.659 44.2% — — — 14.3% -2.72 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1504 99.5 +0.80 -2.44 0.371 30.3% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.01
Career — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29 — 1843 139.1 -2.86 -1.24 0.845 47.2% +18 -42 -70 40.4% -0.74 35–38 (48%) 37–49 (43%) 101.4 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.