H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs Marcel Granollers H2H: 4-0
Dominic Thiem holds a 4–0 lead over Marcel Granollers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2016 Roland Garros fourth round 6-2 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 6-2 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 | Marcel Granollers | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2014* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 6-4 7-5 | Marcel Granollers | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2014* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | Marcel Granollers | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2014* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Marcel Granollers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Marcel Granollers | #1,009 | #19 | 1,635 | 1,934 | 202 | 245 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominic Thiem | Marcel Granollers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #56 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | 2011 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #27 | 1,897 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2012 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #38 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2014 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #46 | 1,781 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2015 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | 2016 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #37 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #177 | 1,702 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,724 | 0 | 4 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |