H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Nicolas Mahut H2H: 0-1

Nicolas Mahut holds a 1–0 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2014 Monte-Carlo Masters first round 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Mahut #40 4-6 6-3 6-2 Dominic Thiem #84 Match data Apr 15, 2014* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Nicolas Mahut #164 6-3 6-4 Dominic Thiem #257 Match data Apr 22, 2013 Q1 Q Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Nicolas Mahut
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominic Thiem Nicolas Mahut
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
28 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% — — — — — 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's and 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominic Thiem Nicolas Mahut
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9% 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7%
19 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3% 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0%
20 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1% 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4%
21 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1% 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9%
22 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4% 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2%
23 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5% 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7%
24 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4% 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6%
25 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0% 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9%
26 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0% 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5%
27 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4% 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2%
28 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5% 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4%
29 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1% 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6%
30 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8% 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2%
Career — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2% — 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominic Thiem Nicolas Mahut
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.11
19 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14
20 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22
21 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 — — 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 -0.20
22 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 95.6 +0.16
23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 — — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.50
24 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) 100.3 -1.54
25 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) 101.5 -1.38
26 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) 97.7 -1.66
27 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% — — +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.02
28 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 — +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 96.5 -0.59
29 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 — -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -0.18
30 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) 101.2 -1.76
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 — +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 +0.94
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) 97.4 +0.82
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) 105.4 +0.49
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) 103.5 +1.44
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) 100.9 +0.80
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 — — 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.4 +0.03
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% — -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 98.8 +0.13
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1668 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1629 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29 — 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.