H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Peter Gojowczyk H2H: 2-1

Dominic Thiem holds a 2–1 lead over Peter Gojowczyk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2017 Paris Masters second round 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Peter Gojowczyk
GER Age 37 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #6 6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 Peter Gojowczyk #62 Match data Nov 2, 2017* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Dominic Thiem #10 7-5 7-6(2) Peter Gojowczyk #209 Match data Sep 23, 2016* R16 Metz ATP 250 Hard
Peter Gojowczyk #162 7-5 6-0 Dominic Thiem #139 Match data Jan 1, 2014* R32 Qatar Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Peter Gojowczyk #1,284 #39 1,175 1,884 75 97 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Peter Gojowczyk
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #494 1,515 0 0
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7 2012 0–1 0.0% #181 1,585 0 0
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 2013 1–1 50.0% #162 1,609 0 0
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11 2014 7–8 46.7% #79 1,697 0 0
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16 2015 1–3 25.0% #194 1,652 0 0
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17 2016 1–2 33.3% #189 1,678 0 0
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2017 14–9 60.9% #60 1,809 0 1
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2018 23–25 47.9% #59 1,800 0 1
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2019 10–21 32.3% #117 1,672 0 1
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17 2020 1–3 25.0% #145 1,622 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2021 13–9 59.1% #86 1,757 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2022 4–14 22.2% #235 1,574 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominic Thiem Peter Gojowczyk
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 5 4 9 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2016 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2018 17 17 34 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 8 14 22 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
30 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% — 56 66 122 45.9% 7 17 24 29.2% 12 14 26 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's and 171/172 of Peter Gojowczyk's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominic Thiem Peter Gojowczyk
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1% 2010 1/1 1.0 5.0 64.3% 47.6% 51.4% 30.0% 50.0% 49.0% 38.7%
21 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4% 2012 1/1 4.0 4.0 58.5% 56.9% 43.1% 47.1% 44.4% 51.2% 38.5%
23 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5% 2013 2/2 11.5 7.0 53.5% 76.7% 50.7% 63.1% 47.3% 64.8% 39.4%
24 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4% 2014 15/15 7.4 3.5 57.4% 74.7% 50.2% 69.6% 49.6% 64.1% 35.1%
25 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0% 2015 4/4 6.5 3.0 54.2% 72.3% 48.8% 60.7% 35.4% 61.5% 41.3%
26 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0% 2016 3/3 13.3 1.7 61.2% 75.8% 48.3% 70.8% 37.5% 65.1% 26.5%
27 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4% 2017 23/23 7.6 4.1 54.1% 78.0% 48.0% 53.8% 54.0% 64.1% 37.2%
28 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5% 2018 48/48 6.9 3.3 54.2% 75.4% 49.2% 55.9% 36.1% 63.2% 35.3%
29 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1% 2019 31/31 6.2 4.0 54.0% 70.0% 45.3% 54.6% 40.8% 58.7% 33.9%
30 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8% 2020 4/4 9.3 4.5 57.1% 72.9% 50.7% 50.0% 26.7% 63.2% 33.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/22 7.6 5.1 51.7% 78.0% 48.0% 65.7% 38.3% 63.5% 35.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 17/18 3.9 4.5 52.9% 65.5% 44.5% 51.3% 38.3% 55.6% 32.1%
Career — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2% — 171/172 6.9 4.0 54.2% 73.7% 47.8% 57.5% 41.1% 61.7% 35.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominic Thiem Peter Gojowczyk
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02 2007 1484 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16 2008 1463 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — -1.38 2010 1516 104.5 +0.44 +1.12 0.759 45.0% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.20
21 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) — +0.34 2011 1506 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) — -0.64 2012 1585 118.6 -1.08 -5.85 0.788 45.0% — — — 40.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.02
23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) — +0.76 2013 1610 112.7 -1.87 +0.62 1.118 51.5% — — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.36
24 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) — +0.03 2014 1697 138.1 +0.13 +0.88 0.980 50.0% +27 -187 -115 47.4% -0.16 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.47
25 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) — -1.32 2015 1653 118.0 +0.17 +0.96 1.073 51.7% +47 — — 33.3% 0.00 — — — +0.08
26 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) — -2.09 2016 1678 121.7 +1.67 -1.23 0.759 46.8% +42 — — 25.0% -0.88 1–0 0–2 — -0.59
27 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.26 2017 1810 134.4 -0.07 +0.58 1.038 50.9% -21 — -60 55.2% +0.15 6–4 (60%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.94
28 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) — -2.20 2018 1800 151.9 -0.36 -0.06 0.961 49.3% -3 -173 — 46.4% -0.20 11–3 (79%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.51
29 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) — -1.03 2019 1672 144.1 -3.39 -1.36 0.820 46.7% +60 -106 +26 36.7% -0.85 5–7 (42%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.60
30 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.23 2020 1623 120.0 -1.23 -1.08 0.921 48.9% +60 — — 30.8% -0.46 — 1–1 — +0.24
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1758 125.5 -0.63 -0.49 0.973 49.7% +19 — -47 54.1% +0.10 7–2 (78%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.90
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1575 116.4 -5.50 -2.19 0.723 44.1% +37 — +117 16.7% -2.36 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1567 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29 — 1885 137.5 -1.36 -0.43 0.916 48.6% +20 -162 -24 43.5% -0.44 32–21 (60%) 29–37 (44%) 103.1 -0.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.