H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Philipp Kohlschreiber H2H: 2-2 (incl. walkovers)

Dominic Thiem vs Philipp Kohlschreiber: 1–2 excluding walkovers; 2–2 including 1 walkover. Across 4 main-draw results including walkovers, Philipp Kohlschreiber leads 2–0 on clay, while Dominic Thiem leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2016 Halle Open quarterfinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H including walkovers
2 – 2
4 main-draw results
Philipp Kohlschreiber
GER Age 42 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #7 (w/o) Philipp Kohlschreiber #25 Match data Jun 18, 2016* QF Halle Open ATP 500 Grass
Dominic Thiem #7 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 Philipp Kohlschreiber #25 Match data Jun 13, 2016* F Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Grass
Philipp Kohlschreiber #27 7-6(7) 4-6 7-6(4) Dominic Thiem #15 Match data May 1, 2016* F Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Philipp Kohlschreiber #39 6-0 7-6(6) Dominic Thiem #21 Match data Aug 8, 2015* SF Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Philipp Kohlschreiber #779 #16 2,160 2,047 449 375 54.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Philipp Kohlschreiber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #247 1,493 0 0
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 2003 1–3 25.0% #208 1,541 0 0
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0 2004 6–10 37.5% #88 1,563 0 0
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3 2005 12–25 32.4% #86 1,539 0 0
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7 2006 23–20 53.5% #62 1,666 0 0
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 2007 30–23 56.6% #32 1,770 0 1
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11 2008 29–19 60.4% #28 1,844 0 2
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16 2009 34–26 56.7% #27 1,835 0 2
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17 2010 34–24 58.6% #34 1,867 0 2
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2011 28–22 56.0% #43 1,851 0 3
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2012 40–24 62.5% #20 1,893 0 4
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2013 33–25 56.9% #22 1,927 0 4
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17 2014 36–25 59.0% #24 1,911 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2015 30–22 57.7% #34 1,952 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 30–23 56.6% #32 1,882 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 32–20 61.5% #29 1,983 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 2018 24–22 52.2% #34 1,889 0 8
35 — — — — — — — 2019 17–21 44.7% #79 1,788 0 8
36 — — — — — — — 2020 2–7 22.2% #98 1,730 0 8
37 — — — — — — — 2021 7–9 43.8% #114 1,716 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2022 1–3 25.0% #416 1,662 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominic Thiem Philipp Kohlschreiber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
21 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2005 6 10 16 37.5% 2 9 11 18.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2007 12 13 25 48.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 22 13 35 62.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
25 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 19 16 35 54.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
26 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 21 15 36 58.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 16 15 31 51.6% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
28 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — 2012 20 15 35 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
29 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 15 14 29 51.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
30 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 15 9 24 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 11 11 22 50.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 13 26 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 17 11 28 60.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 10 18 44.4% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% — — — — — 224 203 427 52.5% 160 125 285 56.1% 60 41 101 59.4% 5 6 11 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's and 806/824 of Philipp Kohlschreiber's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominic Thiem Philipp Kohlschreiber
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9% 2002 2/2 7.0 3.0 46.3% 67.5% 46.4% 64.4% 40.0% 56.1% 36.5%
19 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3% 2003 4/4 3.5 2.3 55.0% 63.8% 48.6% 51.8% 52.8% 56.9% 33.2%
20 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1% 2004 16/16 5.5 3.8 52.6% 68.6% 50.0% 53.5% 40.6% 59.8% 40.5%
21 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1% 2005 37/37 4.4 2.7 57.3% 69.6% 49.7% 55.1% 41.2% 61.0% 36.0%
22 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4% 2006 42/43 5.5 2.4 56.7% 70.7% 51.8% 61.6% 39.0% 62.4% 36.5%
23 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5% 2007 53/53 4.7 2.5 59.8% 71.6% 54.2% 56.1% 43.4% 64.3% 38.2%
24 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4% 2008 47/48 5.4 2.3 62.8% 72.7% 55.5% 66.4% 41.3% 66.2% 38.6%
25 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0% 2009 58/60 5.3 1.9 66.0% 70.5% 55.8% 59.4% 42.9% 65.7% 38.4%
26 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0% 2010 56/58 6.7 2.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 61.6% 41.1% 66.7% 38.6%
27 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4% 2011 50/50 6.2 2.8 57.6% 72.6% 54.4% 64.6% 42.4% 64.8% 36.1%
28 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5% 2012 63/64 7.6 2.0 59.8% 74.6% 56.1% 66.1% 49.6% 67.2% 37.0%
29 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1% 2013 55/58 6.5 1.8 59.3% 74.9% 56.6% 62.6% 45.4% 67.4% 35.5%
30 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8% 2014 61/61 5.7 1.6 58.5% 73.6% 56.7% 58.8% 49.5% 66.4% 37.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 51/52 5.3 1.5 63.6% 72.0% 56.4% 58.6% 44.3% 66.2% 38.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 50/53 5.1 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.2% 61.9% 37.9% 64.6% 38.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 50/52 5.3 2.1 59.6% 77.0% 51.4% 61.0% 43.8% 66.7% 38.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 46/46 5.3 1.8 61.9% 70.8% 58.3% 62.4% 43.4% 65.9% 35.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 38/38 4.8 1.8 61.6% 70.8% 55.4% 56.4% 36.5% 64.8% 35.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 8/9 4.3 1.5 59.5% 67.5% 48.8% 61.0% 48.0% 60.1% 32.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 15/16 5.8 1.6 61.2% 71.2% 55.0% 65.7% 48.2% 64.9% 34.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 4.3 2.8 66.1% 66.7% 43.8% 62.0% 25.9% 59.2% 34.0%
Career — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2% — 806/824 5.6 2.1 60.3% 72.6% 54.4% 60.9% 43.2% 65.3% 37.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominic Thiem Philipp Kohlschreiber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16 2002 1494 111.7 +1.75 +1.24 0.831 46.7% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.30
19 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35 2003 1541 110.3 -0.91 -0.64 0.771 45.0% — -19 — 20.0% -1.90 1–0 0–1 — -0.46
20 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38 2004 1563 118.6 -1.81 +1.68 1.008 50.2% +51 -66 — 47.4% -0.05 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 96.7 -0.09
21 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34 2005 1540 123.1 -1.25 -0.93 0.921 48.6% +19 -88 +74 31.3% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 5–10 (33%) 98.9 -0.45
22 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64 2006 1666 128.8 +0.48 -0.70 0.972 49.3% -24 -88 -28 52.5% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 8–6 (57%) 108.2 -1.11
23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76 2007 1770 145.5 +1.76 +1.27 1.071 51.1% -47 -11 -166 57.6% +0.38 6–8 (43%) 16–7 (70%) 104.2 -0.25
24 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03 2008 1844 153.8 +3.49 +2.48 1.143 52.2% -16 -88 -136 59.1% +0.74 5–7 (42%) 11–12 (48%) 99.3 -0.27
25 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32 2009 1835 152.5 +2.28 +2.14 1.118 52.0% -30 +10 -14 55.3% +0.46 13–8 (62%) 10–17 (37%) 98.4 -0.32
26 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09 2010 1868 156.0 +3.32 +2.10 1.157 52.4% -11 -11 +3 57.9% +0.75 11–9 (55%) 8–10 (44%) 97.9 +0.18
27 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26 2011 1851 151.1 +1.76 -0.10 1.027 50.5% -4 -7 +92 52.5% 0.00 8–7 (53%) 14–8 (64%) 104.9 -1.50
28 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20 2012 1893 154.1 +3.39 +0.59 1.127 52.0% -25 -18 +158 58.8% +0.59 15–8 (65%) 22–18 (55%) 105.4 +1.05
29 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03 2013 1927 162.7 +4.14 -0.29 1.089 51.3% -14 +31 +21 57.0% +0.39 8–6 (57%) 17–12 (59%) 101.7 -0.19
30 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23 2014 1912 156.3 +2.23 +1.94 1.128 51.7% -11 +29 +33 61.0% +0.76 7–12 (37%) 13–12 (52%) 95.6 +2.10
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1952 161.6 +2.46 +2.49 1.146 52.1% -67 +66 -9 58.0% +0.65 8–12 (40%) 11–14 (44%) 95.9 -1.97
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1882 163.8 +1.22 +2.34 1.088 51.3% -20 +107 +97 55.5% +0.50 10–4 (71%) 7–8 (47%) 102.0 -2.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1984 158.4 +2.60 +1.78 1.141 52.1% -11 -24 -80 58.6% +0.47 9–6 (60%) 14–10 (58%) 101.8 -1.04
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1890 153.2 +1.55 +0.41 1.030 50.3% +33 -4 +11 51.7% +0.07 7–9 (44%) 11–12 (48%) 92.9 -0.03
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1788 154.7 +0.90 +0.51 1.021 50.1% +79 +60 +47 48.4% -0.06 1–7 (13%) 5–6 (45%) 91.8 -1.80
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1730 128.4 -0.63 -1.11 0.811 46.5% +114 +44 — 31.8% -0.86 1–1 0–2 — -0.15
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1716 122.5 +1.57 -1.49 0.971 49.5% +52 +69 +81 45.2% -0.52 0–4 (0%) 5–2 (71%) 96.6 -0.29
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1662 109.8 -0.75 -1.70 0.832 46.1% +93 — — 36.4% -1.64 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
Career — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29 — 2047 158.0 +2.01 +1.06 1.072 51.1% -8 +6 +20 54.2% +0.30 120–119 (50%) 181–171 (51%) 98.6 -1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.