H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-0
Dominic Thiem holds a 1–0 lead over Radek Stepanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2014 Barcelona second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2014* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 6-4 6-4 | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominic Thiem | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |