H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dominic Thiem vs Roger Federer H2H: 5-2

Dominic Thiem holds a 5–2 lead over Roger Federer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Dominic Thiem leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2019 Tour Finals round-robin match 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 32 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Roger Federer
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 11, 2019 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Dominic Thiem #5 7-5 7-5 Roger Federer #3 Match data
May 11, 2019* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Dominic Thiem #5 3-6 7-6(11) 6-4 Roger Federer #3 Match data
Mar 17, 2019* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 F Hard Dominic Thiem #8 3-6 6-3 7-5 Roger Federer #4 Match data
Nov 12, 2018 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Roger Federer #3 6-2 6-3 Dominic Thiem #8 Match data
Jun 12, 2016* Stuttgart ATP 250 SF Grass Dominic Thiem #7 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 Roger Federer #3 Match data
May 13, 2016* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Dominic Thiem #15 7-6(2) 6-4 Roger Federer #2 Match data
Jan 9, 2016* Brisbane ATP 250 SF Hard Roger Federer #3 6-1 6-4 Dominic Thiem #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,241 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17
Roger Federer #97 #1 12,315 2,430 1,206 267 81.9% 20 28 6 22 27 103

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominic Thiem Roger Federer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–3 40.0% #301 1,530 0 0
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0 1999 12–14 46.2% #64 1,663 0 0
18 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0 2000 30–27 52.6% #29 1,771 0 0
19 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0 2001 46–20 69.7% #13 1,874 0 1
20 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,848 0 0 2002 55–22 71.4% #6 1,944 0 4
21 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,889 0 3 2003 74–16 82.2% #2 2,104 1 11
22 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,015 0 7 2004 70–5 93.3% #1 2,301 4 22
23 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8 2005 80–4 95.2% #1 2,348 6 33
24 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,064 0 11 2006 90–5 94.7% #1 2,401 9 45
25 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,145 0 16 2007 67–9 88.2% #1 2,330 12 53
26 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,200 1 17 2008 63–15 80.8% #2 2,198 13 57
27 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17 2009 59–12 83.1% #1 2,259 15 61
28 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17 2010 66–13 83.5% #2 2,311 16 66
29 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17 2011 61–12 83.6% #3 2,340 16 70
30 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,627 1 17 2012 67–11 85.9% #2 2,347 17 76
31 — — — — — — — 2013 45–17 72.6% #6 2,189 17 77
32 — — — — — — — 2014 68–12 85.0% #2 2,343 17 82
33 — — — — — — — 2015 61–11 84.7% #3 2,398 17 88
34 — — — — — — — 2016 21–7 75.0% #16 2,283 17 88
35 — — — — — — — 2017 53–5 91.4% #2 2,385 19 95
36 — — — — — — — 2018 49–10 83.1% #3 2,261 20 99
37 — — — — — — — 2019 53–11 82.8% #3 2,240 20 103
38 — — — — — — — 2020 5–1 83.3% #5 2,240 20 103
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–5 64.3% #16 2,128 20 103