H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 0-1
Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 1–0 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2015 Rotterdam fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2015* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-1 6-3 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dominic Thiem | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |