H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs Steve Darcis H2H: 0-1
Steve Darcis holds a 1–0 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Darcis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2011 Vienna fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2011* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 6-2 6-2 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominic Thiem | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |