H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 19:16 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 0-2
Tomas Berdych holds a 2–0 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Berdych won the 2017 Wimbledon fourth round 6-3 6-7(1) 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 6-7(1) 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-1 6-2 6-4 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominic Thiem | Tomas Berdych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |