H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs Tommy Robredo H2H: 0-1
Tommy Robredo holds a 1–0 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tommy Robredo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tommy Robredo won the 2014 Miami Masters second round 6-4 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2014* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tommy Robredo | 6-4 7-6(8) | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Tommy Robredo | #1,059 | #5 | 2,770 | 2,048 | 523 | 351 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominic Thiem | Tommy Robredo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #244 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #30 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 49–26 | 65.3% | #7 | 1,868 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | 2007 | 48–25 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2008 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2009 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2010 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,796 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2011 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,752 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 2,000 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #17 | 1,998 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,883 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #358 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #164 | 1,740 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,684 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,582 | 0 | 12 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,502 | 0 | 12 |