H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Dominic Thiem vs Yen-Hsun Lu H2H: 1-0
Dominic Thiem holds a 1–0 lead over Yen-Hsun Lu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2015 Shanghai Masters second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2015* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 6-3 6-3 | Yen-Hsun Lu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
| Yen-Hsun Lu | #991 | #33 | 1,244 | 1,855 | 143 | 222 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dominic Thiem | Yen-Hsun Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #87 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #158 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #89 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #110 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #64 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #35 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #82 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #59 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 | 2013 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #38 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 | 2017 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #71 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1008 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #568 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |