H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Dominik Hrbaty vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-1
Dominik Hrbaty and Daniel Vacek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 Australian Open first round 6-4 1-6 2-6 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-4 1-6 2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1998* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Dominik Hrbaty | 6-3 6-2 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominik Hrbaty | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |