H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Dominik Hrbaty vs Richard Fromberg H2H: 0-1
Richard Fromberg holds a 1–0 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richard Fromberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Fromberg won the 1998 Auckland quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1998* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Richard Fromberg | 6-2 7-6(6) | Dominik Hrbaty | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominik Hrbaty | #1,508 | #12 | 1,830 | 1,948 | 326 | 296 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominik Hrbaty | Richard Fromberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #78 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #40 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #46 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1999 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2000 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #17 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2001 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2002 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2003 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #61 | 1,670 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2004 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #18 | 1,823 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2006 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2007 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,594 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #253 | 1,563 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,589 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 |