H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Dominik Hrbaty vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 1-6

Thomas Enqvist holds a 6–1 lead over Dominik Hrbaty in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 2–1 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominik Hrbaty won the 2003 Italian Open round of 64 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominik Hrbaty
SVK Age 48 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominik Hrbaty #58 6-3 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #91 Match data May 7, 2003* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #31 6-3 6-2 Dominik Hrbaty #54 Match data Aug 8, 2002* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #6 4-6 6-2 6-3 Dominik Hrbaty #26 Match data Oct 28, 2000* QF Swiss Indoors ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Thomas Enqvist #15 7-5 6-7(4) 6-2 Dominik Hrbaty #32 Match data Apr 21, 1999* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #22 6-2 6-4 Dominik Hrbaty #46 Match data Jan 9, 1999* QF Adelaide International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Thomas Enqvist #9 6-3 6-4 Dominik Hrbaty #60 Match data May 1, 1997* R32 Munich Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Thomas Enqvist #10 6-3 6-2 Dominik Hrbaty #58 Match data Feb 14, 1997* R16 Marseille World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominik Hrbaty #1,508 #12 1,830 1,941 328 299 52.3% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 424 283 60.0% 0 3 0 2 14 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1996 0–1 0.0% #78 1,485 0 0 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,736 0 1
19 1997 24–23 51.1% #40 1,715 0 0 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,713 0 2
20 1998 30–26 53.6% #46 1,690 0 1 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,762 0 2
21 1999 37–27 57.8% #21 1,700 0 2 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,985 0 7
22 2000 38–28 57.6% #17 1,834 0 2 1996 51–26 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 2001 28–29 49.1% #36 1,677 0 3 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,880 0 11
24 2002 22–28 44.0% #51 1,671 0 3 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,870 0 13
25 2003 25–26 49.0% #61 1,669 0 3 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 2004 41–25 62.1% #14 1,739 0 6 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 2005 37–25 59.7% #18 1,823 0 6 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,847 0 18
28 2006 31–26 54.4% #21 1,803 0 6 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,804 0 19
29 2007 9–21 30.0% #136 1,595 0 6 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,712 0 19
30 2008 4–8 33.3% #253 1,571 0 6 2004 12–20 37.5% #72 1,623 0 19
31 2009 2–5 28.6% #141 1,651 0 6 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,588 0 19
32 2010 0–1 0.0% #417 1,591 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Thomas Enqvist
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0%
19 1997 8 7 15 53.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 13 11 24 54.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1998 5 9 14 35.7% 23 15 38 60.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 21 11 32 65.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1999 11 10 21 52.4% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1995 44 13 57 77.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4%
22 2000 22 18 40 55.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 36 15 51 70.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
23 2001 20 14 34 58.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 15 7 22 68.2%
24 2002 12 17 29 41.4% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 20 7 27 74.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 2003 9 11 20 45.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 34 14 48 70.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 2004 29 12 41 70.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2000 32 14 46 69.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
27 2005 24 15 39 61.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2001 16 11 27 59.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2006 20 16 36 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2002 19 10 29 65.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2007 6 12 18 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 11 16 27 40.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
30 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 7 14 21 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 171 151 322 53.1% 119 104 223 53.4% 6 18 24 25.0% 32 26 58 55.2% — 286 161 447 64.0% 49 53 102 48.0% 19 21 40 47.5% 70 48 118 59.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 577/626 of Dominik Hrbaty's and 605/705 of Thomas Enqvist's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Thomas Enqvist
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 5/6 5.4 4.8 45.5% 72.9% 56.0% 57.6% 42.2% 63.8% 40.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 24/25 6.2 5.3 54.7% 72.3% 48.2% 51.1% 44.8% 61.5% 40.4%
19 1997 40/47 5.2 4.8 54.7% 73.2% 49.5% 60.2% 41.6% 62.6% 37.6% 1993 35/41 5.7 5.6 54.1% 72.8% 42.5% 53.3% 40.6% 58.9% 39.5%
20 1998 50/56 5.0 4.6 53.7% 70.2% 50.9% 55.2% 43.7% 61.1% 39.2% 1994 37/42 7.2 5.1 54.5% 74.3% 45.8% 52.9% 43.7% 61.3% 39.1%
21 1999 51/64 6.5 4.3 53.5% 73.4% 52.0% 59.9% 51.0% 63.3% 39.8% 1995 75/85 6.9 4.2 55.6% 76.9% 50.5% 57.6% 47.7% 65.5% 42.5%
22 2000 60/66 6.8 4.1 54.7% 75.1% 51.4% 60.1% 40.4% 64.4% 39.9% 1996 62/77 7.1 4.2 56.6% 76.5% 48.7% 53.3% 46.6% 64.8% 41.3%
23 2001 48/57 7.2 5.4 53.5% 71.4% 47.7% 56.8% 44.3% 60.6% 38.7% 1997 48/56 8.1 3.2 56.0% 78.5% 55.2% 57.5% 44.3% 68.0% 39.5%
24 2002 48/50 4.0 4.1 57.4% 69.6% 48.7% 55.8% 40.8% 60.7% 37.8% 1998 42/50 10.4 3.6 56.0% 78.5% 53.9% 60.9% 47.0% 67.6% 39.0%
25 2003 50/51 4.5 3.0 60.4% 71.9% 52.0% 54.4% 42.5% 63.8% 39.3% 1999 56/70 8.4 4.1 56.7% 77.3% 52.5% 56.4% 45.6% 66.5% 39.4%
26 2004 63/66 4.5 2.9 63.7% 71.6% 53.9% 66.7% 43.9% 65.1% 39.6% 2000 63/74 8.3 4.7 55.3% 77.4% 53.6% 61.7% 39.5% 66.5% 40.1%
27 2005 62/62 5.1 3.6 58.5% 70.4% 50.6% 64.8% 43.1% 62.2% 40.4% 2001 40/52 7.6 5.1 54.0% 74.5% 50.5% 65.8% 38.9% 63.4% 39.7%
28 2006 57/57 4.2 4.5 55.7% 70.2% 48.0% 59.2% 41.8% 60.5% 39.2% 2002 34/40 7.6 5.5 50.4% 76.6% 50.2% 54.1% 49.2% 63.5% 39.8%
29 2007 30/30 3.5 4.7 55.9% 67.4% 45.0% 47.0% 36.0% 57.5% 38.3% 2003 34/36 8.3 5.5 54.8% 75.5% 48.8% 53.9% 45.5% 63.5% 34.5%
30 2008 10/12 2.2 4.5 60.2% 66.6% 40.0% 43.8% 55.8% 56.2% 45.7% 2004 31/32 7.9 5.5 54.9% 74.1% 47.0% 55.4% 42.0% 61.8% 34.6%
31 2009 7/7 2.4 2.7 57.9% 66.4% 44.3% 42.4% 39.2% 57.3% 32.3% 2005 19/19 8.1 4.7 51.9% 73.7% 49.2% 65.5% 42.6% 61.8% 37.8%
32 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 47.8% 40.9% 45.8% 54.5% 25.0% 43.5% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 577/627 5.1 4.1 56.8% 71.3% 50.0% 58.5% 43.1% 62.1% 39.2% — 605/707 7.7 4.6 55.0% 76.1% 50.3% 57.2% 44.3% 64.5% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominik Hrbaty Thomas Enqvist
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1484 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1480 105.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1467 113.2 +0.83 +1.32 1.128 51.8% +54 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.11
18 1996 1486 101.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.10 1992 1736 143.0 +1.05 +1.79 1.050 51.1% +5 -200 — 56.7% +0.40 7–2 (78%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.26
19 1997 1715 142.2 +1.61 -0.42 1.004 50.2% -92 +38 — 49.1% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 11–10 (52%) — -1.58 1993 1714 135.6 -1.12 +1.54 0.961 49.3% +26 -227 — 45.7% -0.17 7–6 (54%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.87
20 1998 1690 141.2 -0.50 +0.95 1.009 50.1% -58 +83 — 52.9% +0.21 7–10 (41%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.64 1994 1763 142.0 +0.37 +0.31 1.012 50.3% +20 — — 50.0% +0.03 10–4 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.15
21 1999 1700 144.9 +1.84 +1.64 1.086 51.5% -29 +125 — 54.6% +0.55 14–10 (58%) 9–14 (39%) — -0.52 1995 1986 163.3 +3.55 +4.87 1.232 53.7% +20 -396 -453 68.5% +1.29 19–6 (76%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.31
22 2000 1835 148.4 +2.28 +2.25 1.120 51.8% -19 -21 — 55.5% +0.54 11–10 (52%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.54 1996 1980 153.5 +2.88 +3.65 1.173 53.1% +30 -418 -435 64.7% +0.99 10–9 (53%) 18–12 (60%) — +2.31
23 2001 1677 137.6 -1.21 +1.03 0.983 49.6% +75 -12 — 50.0% -0.07 10–10 (50%) 19–11 (63%) — +1.46 1997 1880 152.3 +4.95 +2.12 1.234 53.5% +25 -302 — 62.7% +0.98 8–9 (47%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.31
24 2002 1671 135.6 -1.20 +0.37 0.964 49.6% +27 -7 — 43.9% -0.24 7–7 (50%) 4–10 (29%) — +0.59 1998 1870 154.5 +4.80 +2.35 1.203 53.2% +16 -139 -212 63.6% +1.12 15–6 (71%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.78
25 2003 1670 139.0 +1.39 +1.61 1.088 51.2% -3 +27 — 50.8% +0.13 4–12 (25%) 9–11 (45%) — -0.71 1999 1914 157.9 +4.04 +2.58 1.178 52.9% +37 -203 -259 62.2% +0.83 11–9 (55%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.56
26 2004 1740 144.0 +2.13 +2.58 1.135 52.4% +38 -62 -263 58.5% +0.63 14–7 (67%) 12–9 (57%) — +2.00 2000 1907 156.1 +4.14 +2.79 1.197 53.2% +29 -125 -211 65.3% +1.07 18–10 (64%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.24
27 2005 1823 147.1 -0.18 +3.32 1.071 51.2% +25 -104 -310 56.9% +0.52 8–8 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.59 2001 1848 146.2 +1.04 +1.56 1.084 51.4% +10 -28 -76 56.6% +0.52 11–7 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.65
28 2006 1803 139.3 -1.67 +2.09 0.992 49.8% +39 -81 -302 48.6% -0.03 14–8 (64%) 4–7 (36%) — +2.37 2002 1804 148.3 +1.76 +2.14 1.089 51.9% +110 -50 -67 56.0% +0.54 8–4 (67%) 10–7 (59%) — +0.01
29 2007 1596 123.8 -3.83 +0.87 0.902 47.6% +90 +13 — 36.8% -1.00 0–6 (0%) 10–8 (56%) — +1.43 2003 1712 135.7 +0.99 -1.33 0.944 48.9% +66 -44 — 37.2% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.28
30 2008 1571 124.3 -3.12 +4.09 1.044 50.2% +62 +9 — 33.3% -0.80 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.05 2004 1623 132.3 -0.69 -1.15 0.905 48.6% +21 +44 +89 45.8% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.37
31 2009 1651 116.6 -2.65 -1.02 0.757 44.5% +45 — — 36.8% -1.52 0–2 1–0 — +0.05 2005 1589 135.5 -1.21 +0.62 0.989 50.1% +67 — — 43.8% -0.23 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.73
32 2010 1592 105.9 -0.65 +0.69 0.578 37.9% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2012 1587 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1942 145.2 +0.15 +1.64 1.034 50.5% +18 +24 -291 51.1% +0.14 96–102 (48%) 115–112 (51%) 97.7 +1.01 — 2013 156.4 +2.42 +2.14 1.113 52.0% +32 -167 -178 58.0% +0.62 130–96 (58%) 139–150 (48%) 98.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.