H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Donald Young vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 2-0

Donald Young holds a 2–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donald Young leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donald Young won the 2014 Winston-Salem Open second round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donald Young
USA Age 37 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donald Young #46 6-1 6-3 Frank Dancevic #138 Match data Aug 20, 2014* R32 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Donald Young #50 5-7 6-0 6-3 Frank Dancevic #128 Match data Aug 6, 2014* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Donald Young #128 6-1 1-6 7-5 Frank Dancevic #202 Match data Mar 24, 2011* Q2 Q Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donald Young #1,350 #38 1,039 1,932 125 188 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donald Young Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 0–7 0.0% #553 1,402 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 0–3 0.0% #494 1,380 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 3–3 50.0% #100 1,423 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
18 2008 8–20 28.6% #138 1,485 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 2009 0–4 0.0% #194 1,522 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 2010 3–6 33.3% #127 1,555 0 0 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0
21 2011 19–17 52.8% #39 1,800 0 0 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0
22 2012 5–24 17.2% #190 1,587 0 0 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 2013 2–3 40.0% #96 1,696 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0
24 2014 18–21 46.2% #57 1,759 0 0 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0
25 2015 21–22 48.8% #48 1,828 0 0 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0
26 2016 18–21 46.2% #88 1,800 0 0 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2017 25–22 53.2% #61 1,786 0 0 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0
28 2018 3–12 20.0% #248 1,727 0 0 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0
29 2019 0–2 0.0% #230 1,648 0 0 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 2021 0–1 0.0% #411 1,604 0 0 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donald Young Frank Dancevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 6 14 20 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2010 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2011 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2012 5 14 19 26.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2015 21 15 36 58.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2016 11 15 26 42.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2017 20 15 35 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2018 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 103 139 242 42.6% 7 25 32 21.9% 15 24 39 38.5% — — — — — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 310/313 of Donald Young's and 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Donald Young Frank Dancevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2005 7/7 2.0 2.6 61.8% 55.4% 43.7% 41.0% 38.9% 50.9% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 3/3 1.3 4.3 54.6% 47.1% 35.8% 15.7% 4.2% 41.9% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 5/6 5.2 4.4 56.0% 75.2% 48.1% 63.4% 33.9% 63.1% 37.1% 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6%
18 2008 28/28 3.1 3.4 59.1% 66.0% 48.4% 61.2% 38.5% 58.9% 34.4% 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4%
19 2009 4/4 3.5 3.3 54.8% 66.6% 47.1% 54.6% 38.1% 56.1% 31.9% 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3%
20 2010 9/9 3.7 4.0 59.6% 67.5% 46.6% 53.3% 56.3% 59.1% 36.1% 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5%
21 2011 36/36 2.8 3.4 63.9% 67.3% 52.8% 54.0% 44.8% 61.9% 38.8% 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1%
22 2012 28/29 2.1 4.1 60.4% 63.8% 41.9% 52.3% 35.2% 54.9% 37.0% 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1%
23 2013 5/5 2.6 4.4 64.6% 62.3% 53.6% 60.7% 48.4% 57.6% 48.2% 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8%
24 2014 39/39 3.1 3.7 62.4% 69.1% 50.6% 52.6% 38.9% 62.2% 38.0% 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5%
25 2015 43/43 3.6 4.5 55.4% 69.5% 50.3% 49.7% 38.9% 61.1% 36.9% 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3%
26 2016 39/39 3.6 3.7 57.6% 70.7% 51.0% 60.9% 40.9% 62.7% 37.1% 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8%
27 2017 46/47 4.2 4.0 60.9% 69.1% 50.0% 58.3% 45.0% 61.5% 33.4% 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7%
28 2018 15/15 2.7 4.4 60.3% 63.1% 48.9% 51.9% 43.4% 57.0% 33.3% 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4%
29 2019 2/2 1.0 2.5 59.3% 54.4% 44.2% 50.0% 17.1% 50.5% 37.2% 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3%
31 2021 1/1 4.0 6.0 58.9% 65.1% 36.7% 50.0% 50.0% 53.4% 29.4% 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6%
Career — 310/313 3.2 3.9 59.8% 67.4% 49.2% 54.7% 40.7% 60.0% 36.3% — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donald Young Frank Dancevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2004 1483 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 1402 94.5 -5.39 -2.99 0.671 41.9% +21 — — 0.0% -3.27 — 0–2 — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1381 91.8 -3.44 -2.20 0.550 36.6% +7 — — 12.5% -4.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1424 114.0 -0.74 +1.71 1.007 49.9% +6 — — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.03 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
18 2008 1486 119.6 -3.47 -1.98 0.836 47.1% +9 -17 +42 33.8% -1.07 3–4 (43%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.92 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 2009 1522 111.1 -0.60 -1.54 0.727 44.6% +11 — — 18.2% -2.09 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
20 2010 1556 118.9 -1.42 -0.33 0.883 48.4% +27 — — 34.8% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — -0.09 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82
21 2011 1801 137.2 -0.51 +1.10 1.019 50.0% +33 — -239 49.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.05 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23
22 2012 1588 122.1 -6.32 +0.15 0.820 45.9% +58 -147 -95 27.8% -1.51 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.45 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87
23 2013 1696 130.6 -1.46 +1.87 1.137 52.9% +51 — — 30.0% -0.20 — — — -0.08 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19
24 2014 1760 144.1 -1.19 +1.54 1.003 50.0% -2 -165 -294 46.0% -0.18 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.24 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65
25 2015 1829 152.7 -2.57 +1.65 0.948 49.2% +46 -252 -393 47.7% -0.19 8–5 (62%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.51 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03
26 2016 1801 143.0 -1.36 +0.89 0.994 50.0% +6 -187 -184 44.7% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.47 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72
27 2017 1786 149.2 -1.67 -1.82 0.865 48.1% +15 -212 -63 47.2% -0.47 8–5 (62%) 12–4 (75%) — -0.96 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47
28 2018 1727 131.1 -4.14 -0.47 0.774 45.1% +69 — — 22.2% -1.86 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.41 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09
29 2019 1649 106.1 -2.97 +1.63 0.752 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.14 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
30 2020 1629 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04
31 2021 1604 96.3 -1.00 +0.69 0.631 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.13 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11
32 2022 1574 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57
33 2023 1533 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 139.0 -2.33 +0.16 0.907 48.3% +26 -163 -164 39.9% -0.68 41–45 (48%) 51–54 (49%) 103.1 +0.45 — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.