H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Donald Young vs Ruben Bemelmans
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Donald Young vs Ruben Bemelmans.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 38
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,755 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donald Young | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |