H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Donald Young vs Sam Groth H2H: 0-1
Sam Groth holds a 1–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sam Groth leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sam Groth won the 2014 Newport third round 7-6(7) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2014* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Sam Groth | 7-6(7) 6-2 | Donald Young | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Young | #1,350 | #38 | 1,039 | 1,942 | 125 | 187 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sam Groth | #1,155 | #53 | 843 | 1,848 | 36 | 57 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donald Young | Sam Groth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2005 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #553 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #138 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #39 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #190 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #57 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #48 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #172 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #61 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #60 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #248 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #180 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #248 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #411 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |