H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Donald Young vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 0-1

Tobias Kamke holds a 1–0 lead over Donald Young in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2011 Newport round of 16 7-6(3) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donald Young
USA Age 37 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tobias Kamke #96 7-6(3) 6-4 Donald Young #113 Match data Jul 8, 2011* R16 Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donald Young #1,350 #38 1,039 1,932 125 188 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donald Young Tobias Kamke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 0–7 0.0% #553 1,402 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2006 0–3 0.0% #494 1,380 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 3–3 50.0% #100 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 8–20 28.6% #138 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 0–4 0.0% #194 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2010 3–6 33.3% #127 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 19–17 52.8% #39 1,800 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0
22 2012 5–24 17.2% #190 1,587 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0
23 2013 2–3 40.0% #96 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2014 18–21 46.2% #57 1,759 0 0 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0
25 2015 21–22 48.8% #48 1,828 0 0 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0
26 2016 18–21 46.2% #88 1,800 0 0 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2017 25–22 53.2% #61 1,786 0 0 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0
28 2018 3–12 20.0% #248 1,727 0 0 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0
29 2019 0–2 0.0% #230 1,648 0 0 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0
31 2021 0–1 0.0% #411 1,604 0 0 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donald Young Tobias Kamke
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 6 14 20 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 16 13 29 55.2% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2012 5 14 19 26.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2015 21 15 36 58.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 2016 11 15 26 42.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2017 20 15 35 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2018 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 139 242 42.6% 7 25 32 21.9% 15 24 39 38.5% — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 310/313 of Donald Young's and 163/163 of Tobias Kamke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Donald Young Tobias Kamke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2005 7/7 2.0 2.6 61.8% 55.4% 43.7% 41.0% 38.9% 50.9% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 3/3 1.3 4.3 54.6% 47.1% 35.8% 15.7% 4.2% 41.9% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 5/6 5.2 4.4 56.0% 75.2% 48.1% 63.4% 33.9% 63.1% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 28/28 3.1 3.4 59.1% 66.0% 48.4% 61.2% 38.5% 58.9% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 4/4 3.5 3.3 54.8% 66.6% 47.1% 54.6% 38.1% 56.1% 31.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 9/9 3.7 4.0 59.6% 67.5% 46.6% 53.3% 56.3% 59.1% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 36/36 2.8 3.4 63.9% 67.3% 52.8% 54.0% 44.8% 61.9% 38.8% 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6%
22 2012 28/29 2.1 4.1 60.4% 63.8% 41.9% 52.3% 35.2% 54.9% 37.0% 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1%
23 2013 5/5 2.6 4.4 64.6% 62.3% 53.6% 60.7% 48.4% 57.6% 48.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 39/39 3.1 3.7 62.4% 69.1% 50.6% 52.6% 38.9% 62.2% 38.0% 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1%
25 2015 43/43 3.6 4.5 55.4% 69.5% 50.3% 49.7% 38.9% 61.1% 36.9% 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5%
26 2016 39/39 3.6 3.7 57.6% 70.7% 51.0% 60.9% 40.9% 62.7% 37.1% 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4%
27 2017 46/47 4.2 4.0 60.9% 69.1% 50.0% 58.3% 45.0% 61.5% 33.4% 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2%
28 2018 15/15 2.7 4.4 60.3% 63.1% 48.9% 51.9% 43.4% 57.0% 33.3% 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6%
29 2019 2/2 1.0 2.5 59.3% 54.4% 44.2% 50.0% 17.1% 50.5% 37.2% 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3%
31 2021 1/1 4.0 6.0 58.9% 65.1% 36.7% 50.0% 50.0% 53.4% 29.4% 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6%
Career — 310/313 3.2 3.9 59.8% 67.4% 49.2% 54.7% 40.7% 60.0% 36.3% — 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donald Young Tobias Kamke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2004 1483 94.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2005 1402 94.5 -5.39 -2.99 0.671 41.9% +21 — — 0.0% -3.27 — 0–2 — +0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2006 1381 91.8 -3.44 -2.20 0.550 36.6% +7 — — 12.5% -4.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1424 114.0 -0.74 +1.71 1.007 49.9% +6 — — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1486 119.6 -3.47 -1.98 0.836 47.1% +9 -17 +42 33.8% -1.07 3–4 (43%) 2–8 (20%) 97.9 +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1522 111.1 -0.60 -1.54 0.727 44.6% +11 — — 18.2% -2.09 0–1 1–0 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1556 118.9 -1.42 -0.33 0.883 48.4% +27 — — 34.8% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1801 137.2 -0.51 +1.10 1.019 50.0% +33 — -239 49.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 104.7 +2.05 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07
22 2012 1588 122.1 -6.32 +0.15 0.820 45.9% +58 -147 -95 27.8% -1.51 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 92.3 +0.45 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07
23 2013 1696 130.6 -1.46 +1.87 1.137 52.9% +51 — — 30.0% -0.20 — — — -0.08 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 1760 144.1 -1.19 +1.54 1.003 50.0% -2 -165 -294 46.0% -0.18 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 +0.24 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
25 2015 1829 152.7 -2.57 +1.65 0.948 49.2% +46 -252 -393 47.7% -0.19 8–5 (62%) 5–2 (71%) 106.3 -0.51 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04
26 2016 1801 143.0 -1.36 +0.89 0.994 50.0% +6 -187 -184 44.7% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 98.9 +0.47 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37
27 2017 1786 149.2 -1.67 -1.82 0.865 48.1% +15 -212 -63 47.2% -0.47 8–5 (62%) 12–4 (75%) 109.1 -0.96 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29
28 2018 1727 131.1 -4.14 -0.47 0.774 45.1% +69 — — 22.2% -1.86 2–2 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 98.3 -1.41 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69
29 2019 1649 106.1 -2.97 +1.63 0.752 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.14 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03
30 2020 1629 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76
31 2021 1604 96.3 -1.00 +0.69 0.631 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.13 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
32 2022 1574 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1533 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 139.0 -2.33 +0.16 0.907 48.3% +26 -163 -164 39.9% -0.68 41–45 (48%) 51–54 (49%) 103.1 +0.45 — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.