H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Alex Bogomolov Jr H2H: 0-2

Alex Bogomolov Jr holds a 2–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alex Bogomolov Jr leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Bogomolov Jr won the 2011 St. Petersburg quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Alex Bogomolov Jr
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dusan Lajovic #84 6-2 6-1 Alex Bogomolov Jr Match data May 11, 2014 Q1 Q Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Alex Bogomolov Jr 6-2 6-1 Dusan Lajovic #228 Match data Oct 29, 2011* QF St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard
Alex Bogomolov Jr 3-6 6-3 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #239 Match data Oct 20, 2011* R32 Moscow ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Alex Bogomolov Jr — — — 1,893 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Alex Bogomolov Jr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dusan Lajovic Alex Bogomolov Jr
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 7 13 20 35.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2006 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 21 16 37 56.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 11 18 29 37.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
30 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2013 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1% — 56 80 136 41.2% 1 9 10 10.0% 10 13 23 43.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's and 163/165 of Alex Bogomolov Jr's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dusan Lajovic Alex Bogomolov Jr
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0% 2003 12/13 2.6 3.1 67.5% 67.5% 46.1% 54.2% 49.0% 60.5% 36.6%
21 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8% 2004 27/27 1.9 2.7 68.3% 65.6% 49.8% 53.2% 50.5% 59.8% 36.4%
22 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2% 2005 4/4 2.0 2.8 66.8% 56.9% 44.7% 56.1% 45.4% 52.5% 38.0%
23 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8% 2006 4/4 2.8 5.8 64.7% 63.7% 44.6% 40.0% 82.3% 56.9% 32.3%
24 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7% 2008 2/2 2.0 2.0 65.7% 48.8% 44.4% 43.8% 16.7% 47.3% 32.7%
26 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4% 2009 6/6 1.0 1.7 66.6% 60.9% 54.8% 43.2% 65.6% 58.8% 35.1%
27 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9% 2010 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.1% 68.1% 59.1% 33.3% 20.0% 65.2% 32.9%
28 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7% 2011 48/48 2.5 2.8 69.9% 66.8% 51.0% 65.5% 39.6% 61.9% 38.2%
29 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4% 2012 37/38 2.2 2.8 71.0% 64.7% 48.1% 55.9% 37.1% 59.9% 37.7%
30 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0% 2013 14/14 2.8 3.5 69.2% 63.6% 53.2% 57.2% 54.0% 60.3% 36.8%
31 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1% 2014 8/8 1.0 3.5 64.3% 55.6% 50.1% 54.0% 46.4% 53.4% 35.7%
32 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dusan Lajovic Alex Bogomolov Jr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1485 99.4 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.50 — — — +0.05
19 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 113.1 — — — — +20 — — 44.4% -0.22 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
20 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 2003 1539 118.9 -1.69 -0.75 0.926 48.5% +13 — — 44.8% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 -0.07
21 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05 2004 1576 133.8 -2.72 +1.15 0.905 48.4% +24 -69 -26 40.0% -0.46 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 94.1 -0.88
22 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43 2005 1533 101.5 -1.82 -1.12 0.799 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.89 — 0–1 — +0.64
23 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53 2006 1545 107.7 -1.35 -0.35 0.749 45.5% +82 — — 38.5% -0.85 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.07
24 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 102.7 +0.93 2007 1518 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 +0.09 2008 1508 99.4 -1.47 -0.62 0.621 40.1% — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — -0.03
26 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 104.1 -1.07 2009 1579 119.2 -1.75 -2.00 0.851 47.6% +61 — — 46.2% -0.85 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
27 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) 96.2 -0.10 2010 1548 117.6 -1.34 -1.15 0.946 48.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
28 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) 98.0 -3.08 2011 1859 145.8 -0.80 +1.25 1.001 50.0% +1 — -218 52.1% +0.24 13–4 (76%) 9–13 (41%) 104.5 +1.22
29 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) 94.5 +1.50 2012 1709 143.0 -2.62 +0.95 0.940 48.8% +66 -252 -121 38.4% -0.73 2–9 (18%) 3–8 (27%) 88.2 -0.07
30 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) 99.3 +0.28 2013 1668 125.2 -1.08 -0.73 0.929 48.7% +26 — — 40.0% -0.55 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 96.1 +0.21
31 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 +1.15 2014 1611 121.3 -5.50 +1.04 0.765 45.4% +61 — — 29.4% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.68
32 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) 95.3 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) 105.3 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.3 -1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1602 116.0 -1.25 -0.20 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1894 134.5 -1.94 +0.58 0.922 48.6% +31 -174 -152 41.9% -0.48 25–25 (50%) 23–36 (39%) 93.3 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.