H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Dusan Lajovic vs Benjamin Becker
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Dusan Lajovic vs Benjamin Becker.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
GER
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Benjamin Becker | #1,074 | #35 | 1,098 | 1,851 | 153 | 215 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dusan Lajovic | Benjamin Becker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–30 | 41.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #129 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #40 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #304 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #65 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #79 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #40 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #97 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #519 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |