H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Daniel Evans H2H: 0-2

Daniel Evans holds a 2–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Evans leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Evans won the 2021 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Daniel Evans
Great Britain Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Evans #26 6-3 6-3 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #42 Match data Jul 1, 2021* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Daniel Evans #33 6-3 6-7(11) 6-2 Dusan Lajovic #31 Match data Apr 13, 2021* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Daniel Evans #81 7-5 6-3 Dusan Lajovic #24 Match data May 12, 2019* Q2 Q Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Daniel Evans #385 #21 2,195 1,926 141 161 46.7% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Daniel Evans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #477 1,465 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #261 1,442 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #363 1,504 0 0
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 2011 0–2 0.0% #342 1,489 0 0
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #297 1,533 0 0
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0 2013 4–2 66.7% #150 1,692 0 0
24 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0 2014 4–6 40.0% #305 1,679 0 0
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0 2016 9–8 52.9% #66 1,791 0 0
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2017 11–10 52.4% #133 1,820 0 0
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #192 1,787 0 0
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1 2019 18–18 50.0% #42 1,815 0 0
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2020 16–13 55.2% #32 1,857 0 0
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1 2021 23–22 51.1% #25 1,836 0 1
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 2022 27–26 50.9% #27 1,848 0 1
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 2023 15–23 39.5% #38 1,761 0 2
34 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2 2024 7–20 25.9% #164 1,707 0 2
35 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2 2025 7–6 53.8% #185 1,725 0 2
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dusan Lajovic Daniel Evans
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
27 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2020 16 10 26 61.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2021 13 14 27 48.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2022 22 16 38 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2023 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2024 6 11 17 35.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2025 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
36 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1% — 102 97 199 51.3% 18 36 54 33.3% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's and 297/302 of Daniel Evans's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dusan Lajovic Daniel Evans
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.2% 48.3% 35.0% 28.6% — 42.9% 15.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 3.0 5.0 66.3% 53.8% 30.3% 46.7% 100.0% 45.9% 29.7%
20 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0% 2010 1/1 5.0 3.0 52.2% 60.0% 56.3% 20.0% 36.4% 58.2% 44.9%
21 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8% 2011 2/2 7.5 10.0 63.8% 74.1% 53.8% 57.1% 52.4% 66.7% 33.8%
22 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2% 2012 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.0% 58.3% 59.4% 69.2% 75.0% 58.8% 42.0%
23 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8% 2013 6/6 7.2 4.7 60.9% 67.8% 50.3% 65.8% 44.6% 61.3% 40.9%
24 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8% 2014 10/10 7.5 3.3 58.8% 71.6% 51.0% 55.6% 34.0% 63.1% 33.8%
25 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4% 2016 17/17 5.6 4.8 59.5% 70.2% 53.5% 63.1% 40.0% 63.5% 36.2%
27 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9% 2017 19/21 4.7 3.4 59.7% 71.7% 49.1% 53.3% 44.6% 62.0% 39.1%
28 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7% 2018 1/1 2.0 2.0 55.1% 73.5% 47.5% 66.7% 66.7% 61.8% 41.2%
29 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4% 2019 36/36 3.7 2.7 63.2% 71.1% 52.5% 60.1% 40.7% 64.2% 37.4%
30 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0% 2020 29/29 4.1 2.5 59.3% 71.4% 51.9% 60.2% 41.1% 63.6% 36.9%
31 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1% 2021 45/45 4.1 2.6 62.2% 70.4% 52.1% 64.4% 47.2% 63.5% 37.0%
32 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8% 2022 52/53 4.3 2.5 61.6% 71.6% 51.2% 54.9% 46.2% 64.1% 38.2%
33 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8% 2023 38/38 3.9 3.0 59.0% 72.1% 52.8% 61.9% 41.1% 64.1% 36.8%
34 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7% 2024 25/27 4.5 4.5 55.5% 70.8% 49.3% 61.2% 32.6% 61.0% 34.7%
35 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5% 2025 13/13 3.6 3.1 56.8% 67.8% 47.6% 48.6% 43.1% 59.2% 34.5%
36 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 449/451 3.6 1.7 66.4% 67.4% 51.4% 57.7% 39.5% 62.0% 35.8% — 297/302 4.4 3.1 60.2% 70.8% 51.3% 59.1% 42.5% 63.1% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dusan Lajovic Daniel Evans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1482 97.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1465 96.1 -0.67 -0.93 0.265 31.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.06
19 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1442 94.1 +3.68 +2.34 0.549 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.15
20 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 2010 1505 103.0 +1.24 -0.01 1.074 50.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.12
21 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05 2011 1490 102.4 +1.09 -0.34 1.014 49.8% — — — 28.6% 0.00 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03
22 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43 2012 1533 112.2 +0.20 -2.14 1.018 50.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — 0.00
23 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53 2013 1692 123.6 -0.35 +1.64 1.058 51.1% -13 — -160 61.1% +0.33 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
24 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.93 2014 1679 121.9 -0.68 -1.14 0.915 48.4% +41 — -157 42.9% -0.64 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.49
25 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.09 2015 1685 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.07 2016 1792 134.4 +0.32 +0.67 0.994 50.2% -18 — -136 53.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.45
27 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) — -0.10 2017 1820 148.3 -1.83 +2.08 1.029 50.4% +56 -281 — 50.9% +0.03 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.93
28 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) — -3.08 2018 1787 101.8 -0.92 -0.58 1.078 51.7% — — — 33.3% +0.67 0–1 — — +0.12
29 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) — +1.50 2019 1816 150.4 -0.19 +1.96 1.045 50.6% +43 — -139 51.5% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.00
30 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.28 2020 1857 155.8 +0.55 +1.27 1.013 50.3% +40 -315 — 50.6% +0.19 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.13
31 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) — +1.15 2021 1836 156.0 +0.36 +0.91 1.016 50.3% +15 -200 -81 51.6% +0.10 8–9 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.12
32 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07 2022 1848 156.2 +0.45 +2.12 1.064 51.0% +43 -209 -129 50.0% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.14
33 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.78 2023 1761 145.7 +0.74 +1.02 1.026 50.3% +32 -100 — 44.4% -0.27 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.30
34 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.27 2024 1708 133.1 -3.07 -0.42 0.891 48.0% +63 -124 — 37.0% -0.90 3–9 (25%) 5–11 (31%) — -0.57
35 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17 2025 1726 118.5 -1.93 -0.59 0.845 47.4% -17 — -2 46.9% -0.41 4–0 (100%) 0–2 — -0.22
36 2026 1602 116.0 -1.24 -0.10 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45 2026 1651 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1927 148.9 -0.19 +1.10 1.000 50.0% +35 -187 -101 48.2% -0.10 47–57 (45%) 60–70 (46%) 97.2 -1.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.