H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Facundo Diaz Acosta H2H: 0-1

Facundo Diaz Acosta holds a 1–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Facundo Diaz Acosta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Facundo Diaz Acosta won the 2024 Argentina Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Argentina Age 25 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dusan Lajovic #125 7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(3) Facundo Diaz Acosta #243 Match data Jan 13, 2026* Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Facundo Diaz Acosta #87 6-4 6-3 Dusan Lajovic #58 Match data Feb 17, 2024* QF Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Facundo Diaz Acosta #82 #47 1,048 1,688 23 33 41.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Facundo Diaz Acosta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #403 1,475 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 2021 0–1 0.0% #338 1,470 0 0
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0 2023 2–4 33.3% #95 1,494 0 0
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0 2024 16–17 48.5% #79 1,597 0 1
24 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0 2025 3–5 37.5% #212 1,593 0 1
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2026 2–5 28.6% #82 1,594 0 1
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dusan Lajovic Facundo Diaz Acosta
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2023 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2024 1 7 8 12.5% 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2025 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2026 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1% — 5 12 17 29.4% 18 20 38 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's and 56/56 of Facundo Diaz Acosta's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dusan Lajovic Facundo Diaz Acosta
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 5.0 8.0 60.0% 66.7% 40.6% 63.6% 28.6% 56.3% 32.6%
20 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0% 2021 1/1 0.0 7.0 44.8% 60.0% 48.6% 20.0% 42.9% 53.7% 43.4%
21 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2% 2023 6/6 3.0 4.5 62.3% 68.1% 48.0% 59.1% 35.7% 60.8% 36.1%
23 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8% 2024 33/33 2.7 3.0 64.0% 66.3% 52.9% 57.8% 43.4% 61.4% 38.3%
24 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8% 2025 8/8 4.4 4.5 63.6% 66.1% 43.9% 57.5% 42.0% 57.9% 36.5%
25 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7% 2026 7/7 5.6 3.1 69.4% 68.3% 51.4% 41.6% 35.0% 63.3% 35.7%
26 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 449/451 3.6 1.7 66.4% 67.4% 51.4% 57.7% 39.5% 62.0% 35.8% — 56/56 3.3 3.6 64.1% 66.6% 50.6% 55.3% 41.0% 60.9% 37.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dusan Lajovic Facundo Diaz Acosta
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1485 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1476 100.0 -0.98 -0.99 0.745 43.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.24
20 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 2021 1471 102.2 +0.93 -1.50 0.938 48.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.03
21 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05 2022 1449 99.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43 2023 1495 117.1 -2.04 +1.09 0.921 48.6% +21 +38 — 38.9% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.33
23 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53 2024 1597 137.1 -1.92 +0.85 0.992 49.9% -98 +145 — 50.0% +0.18 6–7 (46%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.60
24 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.93 2025 1594 117.4 -2.15 -0.76 0.866 47.6% -23 +86 — 42.9% -0.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.25
25 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.09 2026 1594 111.4 -0.98 +0.31 0.973 49.1% — +90 — 40.9% -0.36 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
26 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) — -3.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) — +1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) — +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1602 116.0 -1.24 -0.08 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1689 127.7 -1.78 +0.50 0.956 49.2% -52 +122 — 45.3% -0.15 9–14 (39%) 8–14 (36%) 95.3 +0.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.