H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 1-4

Feliciano Lopez holds a 4–1 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2019 Acapulco third round 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 27, 2019* Acapulco ATP 500 R32 Hard Feliciano Lopez #73 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5 Dusan Lajovic #43 Match data
Apr 26, 2018* Barcelona ATP 500 R32 Clay Feliciano Lopez #30 6-4 2-6 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #91 Match data
Mar 12, 2017* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Dusan Lajovic #106 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) Feliciano Lopez #34 Match data
Feb 7, 2015* Quito ATP 250 QF Clay Feliciano Lopez #14 4-6 7-5 6-1 Dusan Lajovic #80 Match data
Jun 11, 2014* Queen's Club ATP 500 R64 Grass Feliciano Lopez #29 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 Dusan Lajovic #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dusan Lajovic #152 #23 1,895 1,900 192 257 42.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,546 0 0 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,557 0 0 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 2014 14–16 46.7% #69 1,686 0 0 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,751 0 0 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,822 0 0 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,704 0 1 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,712 0 1 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 2024 17–16 51.5% #81 1,713 0 2 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 2025 4–14 22.2% #121 1,607 0 2 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #152 1,591 0 2 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7