H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-3

Dusan Lajovic and Fernando Verdasco are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 2–1 on clay, while Dusan Lajovic leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2022 Rio de Janeiro third round 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 17, 2022* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #172 7-6(4) 6-3 Dusan Lajovic #39 Match data
Jul 26, 2018* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Fernando Verdasco #33 6-3 4-6 7-6(5) Dusan Lajovic #63 Match data
Oct 5, 2017* Beijing ATP 500 R32 Hard Dusan Lajovic #78 6-1 3-6 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #41 Match data
Sep 22, 2016* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Dusan Lajovic #73 2-6 6-3 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #47 Match data
Aug 4, 2016* Atlanta ATP 250 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #48 7-6(2) 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #70 Match data
Feb 13, 2015* Sao Paulo ATP 250 R16 Clay Dusan Lajovic #77 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dusan Lajovic #152 #23 1,895 1,900 192 257 42.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,546 0 0 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,557 0 0 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2014 14–16 46.7% #69 1,686 0 0 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,751 0 0 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,822 0 0 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,704 0 1 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,712 0 1 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2024 17–16 51.5% #81 1,713 0 2 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2025 4–14 22.2% #121 1,607 0 2 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #152 1,591 0 2 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7