H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Gastao Elias H2H: 1-0

Dusan Lajovic holds a 1–0 lead over Gastao Elias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dusan Lajovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2016 Sao Paulo quarterfinal 6-3 4-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Gastao Elias
Portugal Age 35 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dusan Lajovic #76 6-3 4-6 6-0 Gastao Elias #140 Match data Feb 27, 2016* QF Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Gastao Elias #169 7-6(5) 6-3 Dusan Lajovic #89 Match data Feb 25, 2014* Q3 Q Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Dusan Lajovic #166 6-3 7-6(7) Gastao Elias #132 Match data Feb 5, 2013* Q3 Q Chile Open ATP 250 Clay

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Gastao Elias #499 #57 831 1,738 24 45 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Gastao Elias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #578 1,416 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #172 1,455 0 0
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #139 1,365 0 0
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0 2013 2–3 40.0% #175 1,519 0 0
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0 2014 3–6 33.3% #132 1,658 0 0
24 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0 2015 0–2 0.0% #133 1,542 0 0
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2016 12–13 48.0% #81 1,681 0 0
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0 2017 5–11 31.2% #115 1,648 0 0
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2018 2–6 25.0% #263 1,551 0 0
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dusan Lajovic Gastao Elias
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
24 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2015 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 3 6 9 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
27 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1% — 4 14 18 22.2% 20 28 48 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's and 67/69 of Gastao Elias's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dusan Lajovic Gastao Elias
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 3.0 3.0 28.3% 53.3% 39.5% 50.0% — 43.4% 27.9%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 4.0 3.0 47.3% 48.6% 59.0% 28.6% 60.0% 54.1% 40.6%
20 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0% 2011 1/1 4.0 5.0 58.2% 75.5% 39.5% 50.0% 57.1% 60.4% 41.3%
21 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8% 2012 1/1 3.0 7.0 55.2% 69.0% 46.8% 64.3% 75.0% 59.0% 32.1%
22 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2% 2013 5/5 1.2 3.0 50.3% 61.6% 51.4% 62.6% 59.0% 56.5% 35.7%
23 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8% 2014 9/9 5.7 3.0 49.1% 67.0% 45.8% 61.0% 40.2% 55.5% 38.9%
24 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8% 2015 2/2 3.0 4.0 49.0% 68.5% 55.0% 37.5% 36.7% 61.7% 36.0%
25 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7% 2016 23/25 3.8 2.1 53.0% 68.6% 53.4% 53.6% 46.3% 61.4% 37.5%
26 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4% 2017 16/16 4.1 3.0 52.7% 72.4% 48.2% 53.0% 32.6% 60.9% 34.5%
27 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9% 2018 8/8 2.8 4.1 53.7% 68.2% 44.7% 47.6% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3%
28 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dusan Lajovic Gastao Elias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1493 94.3 -1.30 +0.13 0.493 36.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.15
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1461 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1417 95.1 -3.92 -0.12 0.884 47.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1441 102.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1454 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 2011 1455 98.1 -0.65 -1.19 1.044 50.8% — — — — — — — — +0.17
21 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05 2012 1366 97.0 +1.14 -2.10 0.784 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.12
22 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43 2013 1519 115.9 -2.88 +0.45 0.820 46.7% — +51 — 33.3% -1.17 1–0 0–1 — -0.11
23 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53 2014 1659 124.7 -3.30 -0.67 0.874 47.4% — +53 — 36.4% -1.23 1–2 (33%) — — +0.09
24 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 102.7 +0.93 2015 1542 102.1 -0.77 -1.80 0.939 48.3% — — — 37.5% -1.00 0–2 — — +0.12
25 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 +0.09 2016 1682 137.4 -1.35 +0.32 0.972 49.5% -192 +187 — 46.6% -0.12 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 103.0 -0.18
26 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 104.1 -1.07 2017 1648 126.9 -2.22 -0.56 0.882 47.4% -120 +116 — 35.7% -1.02 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 99.1 -0.37
27 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) 96.2 -0.10 2018 1552 109.6 -2.57 -0.56 0.848 46.7% — +155 — 26.3% -1.26 1–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.13
28 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) 98.0 -3.08 2019 1541 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) 94.5 +1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) 99.3 +0.28 2021 1557 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 +1.15 2022 1542 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) 95.3 -0.07 2023 1541 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) 105.3 -0.78 2024 1529 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.3 -1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1602 116.0 -1.24 -0.19 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1738 120.9 -2.05 -0.25 0.895 47.9% -163 +130 — 37.5% -0.83 9–14 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 97.6 -0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.