H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Dusan Lajovic vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 2-0
Dusan Lajovic holds a 2–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dusan Lajovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2018 Kitzbuhel third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2018* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Dusan Lajovic | 6-4 6-2 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Dusan Lajovic | 7-6(5) 6-2 3-6 3-6 6-3 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dusan Lajovic | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |