H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 0-1

Ivan Dodig holds a 1–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2015 Istanbul round of 16 5-7 7-6(1) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Ivan Dodig
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dusan Lajovic #106 5-7 7-5 6-0 Ivan Dodig #198 Match data Mar 9, 2017* Q1 Q Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Ivan Dodig #107 5-7 7-6(1) 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #79 Match data May 1, 2015* R16 Istanbul ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ivan Dodig #423 #29 1,330 1,966 115 132 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Ivan Dodig
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #422 1,508 0 0
24 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0 2009 2–2 50.0% #180 1,546 0 0
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2010 7–7 50.0% #88 1,724 0 0
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0 2011 26–23 53.1% #36 1,776 0 1
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2012 15–22 40.5% #72 1,783 0 1
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0 2013 32–24 57.1% #33 1,918 0 1
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1 2014 15–23 39.5% #95 1,758 0 1
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2015 8–11 42.1% #87 1,668 0 1
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1 2016 7–16 30.4% #147 1,571 0 1
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 2017 3–2 60.0% #336 1,607 0 1
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dusan Lajovic Ivan Dodig
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 17 14 31 54.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
28 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 20 16 36 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
29 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 11 17 28 39.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
30 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 2 10 12 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
33 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1% — 73 85 158 46.2% 25 32 57 43.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's and 245/246 of Ivan Dodig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dusan Lajovic Ivan Dodig
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8% 2008 1/1 1.0 0.0 56.6% 70.0% 34.8% 40.0% — 54.7% 24.5%
24 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.5 52.2% 69.3% 49.8% 56.0% 53.8% 59.6% 36.0%
25 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7% 2010 14/14 8.6 3.2 57.0% 73.5% 52.2% 55.5% 51.3% 64.5% 39.5%
26 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4% 2011 49/49 7.6 3.1 58.3% 70.5% 49.5% 58.8% 40.1% 61.9% 35.9%
27 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9% 2012 36/37 8.2 3.5 57.4% 72.1% 47.9% 59.4% 35.2% 61.7% 37.0%
28 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7% 2013 56/56 9.3 3.0 58.6% 75.1% 54.1% 61.4% 45.5% 66.5% 38.4%
29 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4% 2014 38/38 8.5 3.4 57.9% 74.4% 49.5% 57.5% 42.1% 63.9% 35.2%
30 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0% 2015 19/19 8.7 3.0 59.4% 74.5% 53.9% 57.0% 45.5% 66.3% 37.9%
31 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1% 2016 23/23 8.0 3.6 59.8% 69.3% 48.5% 59.3% 47.9% 60.9% 33.9%
32 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8% 2017 5/5 5.4 5.8 62.0% 70.2% 44.5% 53.9% 34.3% 60.7% 39.9%
33 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 449/451 3.6 1.7 66.4% 67.4% 51.4% 57.7% 39.5% 62.0% 35.8% — 245/247 8.3 3.3 58.3% 72.8% 50.6% 58.8% 42.6% 63.5% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dusan Lajovic Ivan Dodig
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43 2007 1495 106.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53 2008 1509 106.8 +4.34 +3.57 0.541 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.29
24 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.93 2009 1546 117.4 -1.85 +0.71 0.891 48.0% +60 — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.48
25 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.09 2010 1724 125.3 +0.48 +1.37 1.113 52.2% +20 — — 52.9% +0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
26 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.07 2011 1777 150.6 -0.35 -0.75 0.941 49.0% +49 -206 -91 49.6% -0.25 12–4 (75%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.33
27 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) — -0.10 2012 1784 142.5 -1.17 -0.16 0.965 49.4% +59 -235 -120 40.4% -0.53 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.32
28 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) — -3.08 2013 1919 160.6 +2.92 +2.62 1.146 52.4% -16 -288 -73 54.7% +0.35 8–10 (44%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.81
29 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) — +1.50 2014 1758 150.7 -0.20 -0.49 0.977 49.6% -2 -88 — 44.6% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.01
30 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.28 2015 1668 137.9 +1.03 +1.07 1.123 51.4% +16 -3 — 47.9% +0.08 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.31
31 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) — +1.15 2016 1572 126.0 -1.95 -1.62 0.867 47.8% -29 +124 +224 40.7% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.02
32 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07 2017 1607 117.9 -1.14 +0.70 1.014 50.1% — +110 — 53.8% -0.15 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.39
33 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.78 2018 1593 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1602 116.0 -1.24 -0.08 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1573 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.39
Career — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51 — 1967 146.6 +0.28 +0.40 1.007 50.2% +16 -119 -48 47.8% -0.12 39–39 (50%) 56–50 (53%) 103.4 -1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.