H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 0-6

Ivo Karlovic holds a 6–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Ivo Karlovic leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2016 Paris Masters second round 7-6(4) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 6
6 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 2, 2016* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Ivo Karlovic #20 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Dusan Lajovic #89 Match data
Aug 13, 2016* Los Cabos ATP 250 SF Hard Ivo Karlovic #24 6-2 1-1 (ret.) Dusan Lajovic #72 Match data
Apr 29, 2016* Istanbul ATP 250 R16 Clay Ivo Karlovic #31 7-6(11) 7-6(7) Dusan Lajovic #69 Match data
Oct 30, 2015* Basel ATP 500 R16 Hard Ivo Karlovic #23 7-6(4) 7-5 Dusan Lajovic #93 Match data
Feb 26, 2015* Acapulco ATP 500 R16 Hard Ivo Karlovic #23 3-6 6-3 6-1 Dusan Lajovic #78 Match data
May 6, 2010* Belgrade ATP 250 R32 Clay Ivo Karlovic #33 7-6(4) 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #530 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dusan Lajovic #152 #23 1,895 1,900 192 257 42.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,546 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,557 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2014 14–16 46.7% #69 1,686 0 0 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,751 0 0 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,822 0 0 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,704 0 1 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,712 0 1 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4
34 2024 17–16 51.5% #81 1,713 0 2 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5
35 2025 4–14 22.2% #121 1,607 0 2 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #152 1,591 0 2 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8