H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 3-3

Dusan Lajovic and Jeremy Chardy are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 3–1 on clay, while Dusan Lajovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2021 Belgrade 2 fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 28, 2021* Belgrade 2 ATP 250 R16 Clay Dusan Lajovic #39 6-3 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #58 Match data
Aug 1, 2019* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Jeremy Chardy #74 3-6 6-4 6-3 Dusan Lajovic #26 Match data
May 4, 2018* Istanbul ATP 250 R16 Clay Jeremy Chardy #87 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 Dusan Lajovic #92 Match data
Oct 30, 2017 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Hard Jeremy Chardy #88 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #69 Match data
Jun 28, 2017* Eastbourne ATP 250 R32 Grass Dusan Lajovic #78 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #70 Match data
Apr 9, 2015* Houston ATP 250 R32 Clay Jeremy Chardy #35 6-4 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #81 Match data
Oct 27, 2011* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Hard Dusan Lajovic #228 6-4 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #110 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dusan Lajovic #152 #23 1,895 1,900 192 257 42.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,546 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,557 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2014 14–16 46.7% #69 1,686 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,751 0 0 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,822 0 0 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,704 0 1 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,712 0 1 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2024 17–16 51.5% #81 1,713 0 2 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2025 4–14 22.2% #121 1,607 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #152 1,591 0 2 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1