H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs John Isner H2H: 1-5

John Isner holds a 5–1 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, John Isner won the 2019 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-6(3) 1-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 2019* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard John Isner #16 7-6(3) 1-6 7-5 Dusan Lajovic #28 Match data
Sep 2, 2018* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard John Isner #11 7-6(8) 6-7(6) 6-3 7-5 Dusan Lajovic #125 Match data
Oct 10, 2017* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard John Isner #16 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(6) Dusan Lajovic #73 Match data
Jun 29, 2017* Eastbourne ATP 250 R16 Grass John Isner #21 3-6 7-6(2) 7-6(4) Dusan Lajovic #78 Match data
Feb 12, 2016* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Dusan Lajovic #79 7-6(10) 4-6 7-6(6) John Isner #12 Match data
May 22, 2015* Nice ATP 250 QF Clay John Isner #17 7-6(3) 6-4 Dusan Lajovic #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dusan Lajovic #152 #23 1,895 1,900 192 257 42.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,546 0 0 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,557 0 0 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0
24 2014 14–16 46.7% #69 1,686 0 0 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,751 0 0 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,822 0 0 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,704 0 1 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,712 0 1 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14
34 2024 17–16 51.5% #81 1,713 0 2 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15
35 2025 4–14 22.2% #121 1,607 0 2 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #152 1,591 0 2 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16
37 — — — — — — — 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16