H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Dusan Lajovic vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-1
Lukasz Kubot holds a 1–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2014 Wimbledon second round 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lukasz Kubot | 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-3 7-6(3) | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dusan Lajovic | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |