H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Richard Gasquet H2H: 2-0

Dusan Lajovic holds a 2–0 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dusan Lajovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2021 Antwerp round of 32 7-6(3) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #133 7-5 7-6(2) Dusan Lajovic #74 Match data Oct 21, 2024 Q1 Q Vienna Open ATP 500 Hard
Dusan Lajovic #33 7-6(3) 6-1 Richard Gasquet #73 Match data Oct 21, 2021* R32 Antwerp ATP 250 Hard
Dusan Lajovic #95 7-6(1) 7-6(1) Richard Gasquet #29 Match data May 9, 2018* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Richard Gasquet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5
24 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15
34 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15
35 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16
39 — — — — — — — 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dusan Lajovic Richard Gasquet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
21 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1% — — — — — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's and 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dusan Lajovic Richard Gasquet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6%
20 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0% 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2%
21 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8% 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6%
22 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2% 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7%
23 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8% 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1%
24 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8% 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8%
25 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7% 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9%
26 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4% 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1%
27 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9% 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5%
28 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7% 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0%
29 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4% 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6%
30 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0% 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9%
31 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1% 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9%
32 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8% 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8%
33 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8% 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4%
34 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7% 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4%
35 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5% 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4%
36 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6% 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3%
Career — 449/451 3.6 1.7 66.4% 67.4% 51.4% 57.7% 39.5% 62.0% 35.8% — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dusan Lajovic Richard Gasquet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35
19 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52
20 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51
21 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61
22 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90
23 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85
24 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 102.7 +0.93 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00
25 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 +0.09 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44
26 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) 104.1 -1.07 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77
27 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) 96.2 -0.10 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10
28 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) 98.0 -3.08 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40
29 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) 94.5 +1.50 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22
30 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) 99.3 +0.28 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59
31 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 +1.15 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72
32 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) 95.3 -0.07 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58
33 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) 105.3 -0.78 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68
34 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.3 -1.27 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26
35 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21
36 2026 1602 116.0 -1.23 -0.21 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03
Career — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51 — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.