H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Dusan Lajovic vs Richard Gasquet H2H: 2-0
Dusan Lajovic holds a 2–0 lead over Richard Gasquet in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dusan Lajovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dusan Lajovic won the 2021 Antwerp third round 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
France
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2024 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Richard Gasquet | 7-5 7-6(2) | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2021* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dusan Lajovic | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
| May 9, 2018* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Dusan Lajovic | 7-6(1) 7-6(1) | Richard Gasquet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Richard Gasquet | #448 | #7 | 3,365 | 2,165 | 596 | 406 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dusan Lajovic | Richard Gasquet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #107 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 30–10 | 75.0% | #16 | 1,851 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,922 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #52 | 1,855 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #30 | 1,892 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #19 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #10 | 2,002 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #26 | 1,935 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #9 | 2,127 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #18 | 1,998 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #31 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,933 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #61 | 1,844 | 0 | 15 |
| 34 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,823 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,772 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #68 | 1,860 | 0 | 15 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 16 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,620 | 0 | 16 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #313 | 1,636 | 0 | 16 |