H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Dusan Lajovic vs Sam Querrey H2H: 1-1

Dusan Lajovic and Sam Querrey are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 1–0 on grass, while Dusan Lajovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sam Querrey won the 2019 Eastbourne Open second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dusan Lajovic
Serbia Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sam Querrey
USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sam Querrey #79 6-2 6-3 Dusan Lajovic #33 Match data Jun 27, 2019* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Dusan Lajovic #77 6-7(5) 4-6 6-4 6-2 (ret.) Sam Querrey #58 Match data Jan 20, 2016* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dusan Lajovic #167 #23 1,895 1,901 192 258 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,038 372 316 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dusan Lajovic Sam Querrey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,541 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,637 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #434 1,455 0 0 2008 28–24 53.8% #39 1,778 0 1
21 2011 2–5 28.6% #190 1,617 0 0 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,900 0 2
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #163 1,545 0 0 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6
23 2013 0–4 0.0% #116 1,556 0 0 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,817 0 6
24 2014 14–17 45.2% #69 1,682 0 0 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7
25 2015 16–21 43.2% #76 1,794 0 0 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,875 0 7
26 2016 18–22 45.0% #93 1,750 0 0 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,896 0 7
27 2017 15–21 41.7% #75 1,717 0 0 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,812 0 7
28 2018 23–23 50.0% #48 1,823 0 0 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,797 0 8
29 2019 20–26 43.5% #34 1,703 0 1 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,944 0 10
30 2020 10–14 41.7% #26 1,699 0 1 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,823 0 10
31 2021 17–25 40.5% #33 1,711 0 1 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10
32 2022 10–20 33.3% #80 1,656 0 1 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,818 0 10
33 2023 23–22 51.1% #52 1,728 0 2 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,689 0 10
34 2024 17–17 50.0% #81 1,695 0 2 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,644 0 10
35 2025 4–13 23.5% #121 1,617 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2026 2–6 25.0% #167 1,602 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dusan Lajovic Sam Querrey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 23 16 39 59.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2011 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 30 14 44 68.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 19 14 33 57.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
23 2013 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
25 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 21 14 35 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2016 8 12 20 40.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 16 14 30 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
27 2017 8 11 19 42.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 8 15 23 34.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
28 2018 8 9 17 47.1% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 16 14 30 53.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — —
29 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 23 13 36 63.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 16 16 32 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
32 2022 3 8 11 27.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2023 8 9 17 47.1% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 2 9 11 18.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — —
34 2024 4 7 11 36.4% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
35 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 114 186 38.7% 114 124 238 47.9% 6 20 26 23.1% — — — — — 250 210 460 54.3% 44 57 101 43.6% 78 47 125 62.4% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/451 of Dusan Lajovic's and 684/688 of Sam Querrey's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dusan Lajovic Sam Querrey
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 17/17 11.4 3.2 57.2% 75.9% 49.8% 62.8% 42.9% 64.6% 34.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 41/41 12.4 3.2 56.6% 79.2% 48.3% 59.9% 39.4% 65.8% 33.9%
20 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.9% 75.7% 57.1% 50.0% 33.3% 67.7% 25.0% 2008 51/52 10.2 3.2 59.1% 74.3% 49.1% 61.1% 41.2% 64.2% 35.5%
21 2011 7/7 2.3 2.1 63.6% 60.6% 43.8% 55.7% 36.1% 54.4% 38.8% 2009 61/61 11.8 3.0 59.4% 80.0% 53.4% 60.4% 44.4% 69.2% 36.2%
22 2012 2/2 2.0 1.5 54.7% 70.0% 49.7% 33.3% 64.3% 60.4% 37.2% 2010 56/56 12.3 3.4 61.5% 79.4% 50.9% 64.4% 45.2% 68.3% 35.1%
23 2013 4/4 2.8 3.5 56.8% 72.2% 38.3% 57.0% 37.5% 57.5% 32.8% 2011 25/25 8.9 3.2 59.6% 74.8% 51.2% 66.6% 31.2% 65.2% 34.4%
24 2014 31/31 5.4 2.5 59.8% 70.3% 51.4% 63.5% 37.0% 62.5% 34.8% 2012 61/61 11.6 3.9 57.6% 80.5% 51.1% 60.0% 42.0% 68.1% 36.0%
25 2015 37/37 3.6 1.8 63.1% 67.6% 53.5% 58.0% 39.8% 62.6% 36.7% 2013 45/46 12.8 3.6 59.6% 78.6% 48.7% 57.6% 35.7% 66.5% 33.6%
26 2016 40/40 4.2 2.0 66.8% 70.5% 54.0% 55.9% 33.8% 64.8% 33.4% 2014 45/46 14.4 2.8 60.5% 79.4% 51.9% 73.7% 41.8% 68.7% 33.8%
27 2017 36/36 3.4 1.4 68.7% 67.5% 55.1% 64.0% 49.2% 63.7% 33.9% 2015 44/44 13.8 3.6 59.5% 78.7% 54.4% 64.0% 37.1% 68.9% 33.7%
28 2018 46/46 3.8 1.6 64.5% 68.9% 53.7% 57.7% 41.8% 63.3% 36.7% 2016 51/51 13.1 3.1 58.6% 79.9% 52.3% 59.4% 39.6% 68.5% 33.4%
29 2019 46/46 3.4 1.7 68.8% 66.4% 50.9% 53.5% 44.4% 61.7% 36.4% 2017 55/55 13.5 3.2 57.1% 79.8% 51.8% 62.5% 49.5% 67.9% 37.0%
30 2020 24/24 4.4 2.2 66.5% 67.0% 51.1% 53.0% 35.6% 61.5% 37.0% 2018 43/43 14.3 3.7 58.2% 81.9% 51.7% 60.0% 41.2% 69.3% 34.2%
31 2021 42/42 3.3 1.9 66.9% 66.2% 51.2% 61.0% 38.3% 61.3% 36.1% 2019 41/41 16.8 4.0 62.1% 81.2% 49.4% 60.5% 33.2% 69.1% 33.8%
32 2022 30/30 3.4 1.5 67.8% 65.4% 51.2% 54.4% 35.2% 61.0% 34.8% 2020 9/9 16.8 3.6 60.3% 78.2% 50.8% 33.4% 31.7% 67.5% 31.1%
33 2023 45/45 2.8 1.4 68.1% 66.4% 47.2% 58.5% 42.3% 60.2% 36.8% 2021 25/26 15.2 5.2 56.8% 81.9% 47.7% 52.4% 33.2% 67.3% 30.3%
34 2024 33/34 2.5 1.1 70.0% 68.6% 50.4% 59.2% 40.3% 63.2% 36.7% 2022 14/14 12.4 4.7 58.3% 78.6% 46.1% 56.3% 26.6% 64.8% 29.4%
35 2025 17/17 3.8 1.3 66.2% 62.3% 47.6% 57.0% 31.4% 57.5% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 8/9 2.9 1.0 70.0% 64.8% 52.6% 49.3% 20.8% 61.3% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 449/451 3.6 1.7 66.4% 67.4% 51.4% 57.7% 39.5% 62.0% 35.8% — 684/688 12.9 3.5 59.0% 79.2% 50.9% 61.3% 40.2% 67.6% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dusan Lajovic Sam Querrey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1490 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1542 124.2 +1.62 -2.01 0.962 49.2% -13 — — 46.7% -0.31 1–7 (13%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.03
19 2009 1488 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1637 141.5 +2.16 -1.29 0.990 50.0% +50 -158 — 47.6% -0.08 6–8 (43%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.09
20 2010 1456 98.2 -4.10 +5.17 0.774 46.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.17 2008 1779 145.5 +1.02 -0.70 0.993 50.1% +29 -209 -254 51.5% +0.04 11–8 (58%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.64
21 2011 1617 123.2 -3.15 -1.36 0.850 46.9% +71 — — 31.3% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.05 2009 1900 149.0 +4.79 +0.01 1.176 52.3% +27 -361 -223 62.0% +0.61 8–11 (42%) 13–12 (52%) — +1.27
22 2012 1546 105.7 -1.19 -1.40 0.941 47.7% — — — 100.0% +2.00 — — — +0.43 2010 1873 152.2 +3.95 -0.55 1.108 51.9% +5 -250 +9 58.4% +0.58 13–11 (54%) 14–17 (45%) — +2.65
23 2013 1557 106.0 -2.06 -2.92 0.772 44.9% — +68 — 11.1% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.53 2011 1817 141.7 +1.37 -1.06 0.989 49.9% +19 -173 +81 46.7% -0.10 3–4 (43%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.50
24 2014 1683 134.5 -1.16 -1.70 0.927 48.8% -55 +84 -152 44.2% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.93 2012 2006 157.4 +4.09 +0.39 1.129 52.1% +3 -305 -92 57.8% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 20–13 (61%) — -0.61
25 2015 1794 140.2 -1.72 +1.10 0.980 49.7% -92 +37 — 45.9% -0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.09 2013 1875 153.6 +2.58 -2.07 1.003 50.0% +71 -164 -51 50.0% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 15–15 (50%) — +0.18
26 2016 1751 141.6 +0.22 -1.41 0.950 49.1% -14 +31 — 47.2% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.07 2014 1896 144.5 +3.69 -2.25 1.080 51.0% +17 -178 -23 56.4% +0.33 6–9 (40%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.27
27 2017 1718 142.2 -0.25 -1.56 0.934 49.2% +16 -35 -179 43.2% -0.10 6–5 (55%) 3–16 (16%) — -0.10 2015 1812 152.4 +3.52 -1.09 1.082 51.0% -39 -68 +110 46.7% -0.02 7–9 (44%) 13–18 (42%) — -2.68
28 2018 1823 155.7 -0.39 +1.43 0.999 50.0% -42 +51 -266 51.6% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 8–9 (47%) — -3.08 2016 1797 152.8 +4.13 -1.97 1.060 50.9% -38 -84 +223 56.0% +0.27 8–9 (47%) 18–16 (53%) — +1.80
29 2019 1704 144.6 -2.23 +0.58 0.950 49.4% -32 +176 — 45.2% -0.20 7–8 (47%) 5–10 (33%) — +1.50 2017 1945 161.8 +4.11 +1.06 1.153 52.3% -43 -192 +131 59.1% +0.70 11–6 (65%) 14–13 (52%) — +1.92
30 2020 1699 143.8 -0.71 +0.76 0.961 49.4% -50 +150 — 43.5% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.28 2018 1823 152.3 +4.08 -0.93 1.114 51.7% -5 -127 +252 54.1% +0.58 6–11 (35%) 9–20 (31%) — +1.23
31 2021 1712 145.2 -1.16 -0.58 0.932 48.9% +12 +43 -189 43.2% -0.27 4–7 (36%) 4–9 (31%) — +1.15 2019 1898 146.9 +4.59 -1.49 1.095 51.3% -82 -158 +201 55.6% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 18–15 (55%) — -0.90
32 2022 1657 130.4 -1.81 -1.46 0.892 47.9% -22 +79 -127 38.2% -0.66 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07 2020 1818 128.8 +2.33 -0.47 0.956 48.3% -33 — — 37.0% -0.67 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.60
33 2023 1728 147.4 -2.69 +1.08 0.924 48.5% -28 +34 — 50.5% -0.10 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — -0.78 2021 1690 124.0 +2.41 -3.84 0.926 48.7% -54 — +303 39.1% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.24
34 2024 1695 141.8 -0.34 +0.45 0.997 50.0% -61 +104 — 47.8% +0.02 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.27 2022 1645 117.4 -0.20 -3.77 0.835 47.4% -72 — +250 28.6% -0.97 2–1 (67%) 2–7 (22%) — +0.03
35 2025 1618 123.1 -3.96 -0.07 0.882 47.5% -53 +122 — 25.6% -1.26 0–1 1–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1602 116.0 -1.28 -0.19 0.842 46.9% — +64 — 31.6% -1.32 0–2 2–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1901 144.6 -1.31 -0.09 0.941 49.0% -25 +71 -181 44.5% -0.29 65–75 (46%) 71–98 (42%) 95.2 -0.51 — 2039 155.6 +3.33 -1.02 1.064 51.0% 0 -181 +77 53.2% +0.22 112–123 (48%) 184–198 (48%) 96.0 +0.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.