H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Dusan Lajovic vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 0-1
Teymuraz Gabashvili holds a 1–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Teymuraz Gabashvili won the 2014 Umag third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2014* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Teymuraz Gabashvili | 6-4 6-3 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dusan Lajovic | Teymuraz Gabashvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |