H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Dustin Brown vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 1-0
Dustin Brown holds a 1–0 lead over Ruben Bemelmans in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dustin Brown leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dustin Brown won the 2016 Montpellier quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JAM
Age 41
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 38
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2016* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Dustin Brown | 6-3 6-3 | Ruben Bemelmans | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2015* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Ruben Bemelmans | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 | Dustin Brown | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dustin Brown | #1,058 | #64 | 778 | 1,903 | 61 | 96 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,755 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dustin Brown | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #92 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #167 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #72 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |