H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Eddie Dibbs vs David Carter H2H: 2-0
Eddie Dibbs holds a 2–0 lead over David Carter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eddie Dibbs leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eddie Dibbs won the 1981 Quito final 3-6 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 70
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1981* | Quito | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Eddie Dibbs | 3-6 6-0 7-5 | David Carter | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1978* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Eddie Dibbs | 6-1 6-3 | David Carter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eddie Dibbs | #798 | #5 | 0 | 2,168 | 607 | 264 | 69.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
| David Carter | #606 | #78 | 0 | 1,729 | 76 | 119 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eddie Dibbs | David Carter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #373 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1971 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #236 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #28 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 62–30 | 67.4% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 53–25 | 67.9% | #18 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #145 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 83–28 | 74.8% | #9 | 2,053 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #95 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 76–27 | 73.8% | #6 | 2,076 | 0 | 13 | 1982 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 82–27 | 75.2% | #6 | 1,998 | 0 | 17 | 1983 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #190 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #10 | 2,033 | 0 | 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #12 | 1,928 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1981 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #25 | 1,976 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1982 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #55 | 1,795 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1983 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #90 | 1,817 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #351 | 1,748 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |