H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Eddie Dibbs vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 1-1
Eddie Dibbs and Ion Tiriac are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 1–0 on carpet, while Eddie Dibbs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ion Tiriac won the 1974 Sao Paulo Wct third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1974* | Sao Paulo Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ion Tiriac | 6-3 6-1 | Eddie Dibbs | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1973* | Salisbury | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Eddie Dibbs | 6-1 6-3 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eddie Dibbs | #798 | #5 | 0 | 2,168 | 607 | 264 | 69.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eddie Dibbs | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #28 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 62–30 | 67.4% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 53–25 | 67.9% | #18 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 83–28 | 74.8% | #9 | 2,053 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 76–27 | 73.8% | #6 | 2,076 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 82–27 | 75.2% | #6 | 1,998 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #10 | 2,033 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #12 | 1,928 | 0 | 20 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1981 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #25 | 1,976 | 0 | 22 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1982 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #55 | 1,795 | 0 | 22 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1983 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #90 | 1,817 | 0 | 22 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #351 | 1,748 | 0 | 22 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |