H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Eddie Dibbs vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 1-1
Eddie Dibbs and Nikola Pilic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eddie Dibbs leads 1–0 on clay, while Nikola Pilic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Eddie Dibbs won the 1975 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-2 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1975* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Eddie Dibbs | 6-2 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1974* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nikola Pilic | 6-4 8-6 6-4 | Eddie Dibbs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eddie Dibbs | #798 | #5 | 0 | 2,168 | 607 | 264 | 69.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eddie Dibbs | Nikola Pilic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #28 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 62–30 | 67.4% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 53–25 | 67.9% | #18 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 83–28 | 74.8% | #9 | 2,053 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 76–27 | 73.8% | #6 | 2,076 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 82–27 | 75.2% | #6 | 1,998 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #10 | 2,033 | 0 | 18 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1980 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #12 | 1,928 | 0 | 20 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1981 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #25 | 1,976 | 0 | 22 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1982 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #55 | 1,795 | 0 | 22 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1983 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #90 | 1,817 | 0 | 22 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #351 | 1,748 | 0 | 22 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 |