H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eddie Dibbs vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 2-0
Eddie Dibbs holds a 2–0 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eddie Dibbs leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Eddie Dibbs won the 1974 Nottingham second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 75
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1974* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Eddie Dibbs | 6-4 6-4 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1974* | Houston | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Eddie Dibbs | 6-3 6-3 | Vladimir Zednik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eddie Dibbs | #798 | #5 | 0 | 2,168 | 607 | 264 | 69.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
| Vladimir Zednik | #300 | #35 | 0 | 1,753 | 113 | 157 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eddie Dibbs | Vladimir Zednik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #28 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 62–30 | 67.4% | #22 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 53–25 | 67.9% | #18 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 83–28 | 74.8% | #9 | 2,053 | 0 | 10 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1977 | 76–27 | 73.8% | #6 | 2,076 | 0 | 13 | 1973 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #90 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1978 | 82–27 | 75.2% | #6 | 1,998 | 0 | 17 | 1974 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #93 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1979 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #10 | 2,033 | 0 | 18 | 1975 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #157 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1980 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #12 | 1,928 | 0 | 20 | 1976 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1981 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #25 | 1,976 | 0 | 22 | 1977 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1982 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #55 | 1,795 | 0 | 22 | 1978 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1983 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #90 | 1,817 | 0 | 22 | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #300 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #351 | 1,748 | 0 | 22 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |