H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Daniel Brands H2H: 1-0
Edouard Roger-Vasselin holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Edouard Roger-Vasselin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Edouard Roger-Vasselin won the 2013 Basel quarterfinal 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2013* | Basel | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edouard Roger-Vasselin | #806 | #35 | 1,133 | 1,885 | 84 | 125 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #102 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #87 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #293 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |