H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 0-1

Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Edouard Roger-Vasselin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2013 Japan Open second round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Edouard Roger-Vasselin
FRA Age 42 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Lacko #81 7-5 6-4 Edouard Roger-Vasselin #65 Match data Oct 4, 2013* R16 Japan Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Edouard Roger-Vasselin #806 #35 1,133 1,886 84 125 40.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Edouard Roger-Vasselin Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2004 1–2 33.3% #197 1,450 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2007 5–7 41.7% #97 1,578 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2008 2–6 25.0% #166 1,574 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2009 2–3 40.0% #153 1,645 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2010 2–7 22.2% #124 1,611 0 0 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2011 6–12 33.3% #106 1,687 0 0 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2012 14–19 42.4% #102 1,665 0 0 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2013 23–26 46.9% #52 1,817 0 0 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2014 21–28 42.9% #87 1,693 0 0 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2015 6–12 33.3% #123 1,758 0 0 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2016 2–3 40.0% #293 1,678 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Edouard Roger-Vasselin Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2013 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2014 14 18 32 43.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2015 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 48 72 120 40.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 16 19 35 45.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 209/209 of Edouard Roger-Vasselin's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Edouard Roger-Vasselin Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2004 3/3 3.0 2.0 73.4% 61.2% 44.5% 29.2% 61.1% 57.5% 30.3% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2007 12/12 2.8 2.2 67.3% 64.9% 44.0% 48.6% 33.4% 58.0% 35.9% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2008 8/8 2.8 2.6 63.7% 64.9% 44.1% 55.0% 53.5% 57.4% 31.6% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2009 5/5 7.4 1.4 64.2% 68.3% 47.0% 70.6% 46.7% 60.7% 33.3% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2010 9/9 4.7 3.4 59.4% 67.6% 47.1% 45.8% 30.0% 59.1% 35.0% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2011 18/18 4.0 2.4 63.0% 68.3% 52.3% 51.5% 35.3% 62.1% 37.5% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2012 33/33 5.0 2.7 64.3% 71.7% 50.2% 57.1% 38.8% 64.0% 35.8% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2013 49/49 3.9 2.5 63.7% 70.9% 50.4% 58.9% 40.5% 63.4% 36.8% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2014 49/49 4.3 2.3 66.4% 70.5% 51.2% 68.7% 37.5% 64.0% 34.5% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2015 18/18 5.0 2.2 64.5% 70.1% 47.3% 44.3% 35.0% 61.9% 35.1% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2016 5/5 4.0 2.2 68.3% 61.0% 47.0% 45.0% 46.8% 56.6% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 209/209 4.3 2.4 64.7% 69.5% 49.5% 57.2% 38.8% 62.4% 35.5% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Edouard Roger-Vasselin Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1503 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2004 1450 90.3 -2.33 -2.96 0.712 43.6% — — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–0 — +0.48 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2005 1469 106.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) 101.4 -0.83
23 2007 1578 108.2 -1.34 -0.29 0.854 47.0% -145 +16 +81 42.4% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.09 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.1 -0.54
24 2008 1575 118.4 -1.74 -2.54 0.743 45.6% -109 -18 — 22.2% -1.39 0–2 0–1 — -0.20 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 -0.47
25 2009 1646 121.4 +0.50 -0.06 0.849 48.5% -88 — — 42.9% -0.36 1–1 0–1 — -0.27 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 103.0 -0.64
26 2010 1612 119.9 -2.05 -0.35 0.854 47.2% -4 — — 29.2% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.0 -0.25 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.19
27 2011 1688 137.6 -0.32 -0.04 0.991 49.7% -24 -33 +47 41.7% -0.40 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 92.4 +0.15 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 -0.16
28 2012 1666 139.7 +0.76 -1.06 0.993 50.0% +27 -35 +91 45.9% +0.07 5–9 (36%) 6–10 (38%) 92.6 -0.14 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2013 1817 146.6 -0.17 +0.53 1.005 50.0% -16 -55 -141 45.0% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 4–15 (21%) 96.3 -0.06 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2014 1694 149.9 -0.06 -0.92 0.959 49.5% +33 0 +37 47.2% -0.02 7–11 (39%) 13–18 (42%) 95.1 -1.58 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +1.00
31 2015 1758 131.8 -1.35 -0.48 0.921 48.2% +25 — — 38.8% -0.88 4–7 (36%) 6–1 (86%) 102.0 -0.93 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2016 1679 115.8 -0.56 -0.28 0.832 46.3% — — — 46.7% -1.13 0–2 2–0 — -0.31 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1887 138.3 -0.34 -0.48 0.943 49.0% 0 -26 +24 42.9% -0.34 31–49 (39%) 38–53 (42%) 89.6 -1.53 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.