H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Edouard Roger-Vasselin holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Edouard Roger-Vasselin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Edouard Roger-Vasselin won the 2014 Montpellier third round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2014* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2012* | Moscow | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | 6-2 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q3 | Grass | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | 6-2 6-1 6-1 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edouard Roger-Vasselin | #806 | #35 | 1,133 | 1,885 | 84 | 125 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Edouard Roger-Vasselin | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #102 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #87 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #293 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |