H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-1
Edouard Roger-Vasselin and Tobias Kamke are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on grass, while Edouard Roger-Vasselin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Edouard Roger-Vasselin won the 2013 Basel fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2013* | Basel | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | 7-5 6-3 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Jul 9, 2011* | Newport | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Tobias Kamke | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edouard Roger-Vasselin | #806 | #35 | 1,133 | 1,885 | 84 | 125 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | Tobias Kamke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #102 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #87 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #293 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |